Line 1,661: |
Line 1,661: |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
− | Equivalent expressions for this concept are recorded in Definition 10. | + | Equivalent expressions for this concept are recorded in Definition 10. |
| | | |
| <br> | | <br> |
Line 1,681: |
Line 1,681: |
| | | |
| D10e. {<o, s> C OxS : <o, s, i> C R for some i C I} | | D10e. {<o, s> C OxS : <o, s, i> C R for some i C I} |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | The dyadic relation RSO that constitutes the converse of the denotative relation ROS can be defined directly in the following fashion: | + | <br> |
| + | |
| + | The dyadic relation <math>L_{SO}\!</math> that is the converse of the denotative relation <math>L_{OS}\!</math> can be defined directly in the following fashion: |
| | | |
− | Den(R)^ = RSO = {<s, o> C SxO : <o, s, i> C R for some i C I}. | + | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" width="90%" |
| + | | <math>\overset{\smile}{\operatorname{Den}(L)} ~=~ L_{SO} ~=~ \{ (s, o) \in S \times O ~:~ (o, s, i) \in L ~\text{for some}~ i \in I \}.</math> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
| A few of the many different expressions for this concept are recorded in Definition 11. | | A few of the many different expressions for this concept are recorded in Definition 11. |
| | | |
| + | <br> |
| + | |
| + | <pre> |
| Definition 11 | | Definition 11 |
| | | |
Line 1,707: |
Line 1,715: |
| | | |
| D11g. {<s, o> C SxO : <o, s, i> C R for some i C I} | | D11g. {<s, o> C SxO : <o, s, i> C R for some i C I} |
| + | </pre> |
| + | |
| + | <br> |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| The "denotation of x in R", written "Den(R, x)", is defined as follows: | | The "denotation of x in R", written "Den(R, x)", is defined as follows: |
| Den(R, x) = {o C O : <o, x> C Den(R)}. | | Den(R, x) = {o C O : <o, x> C Den(R)}. |