Bureaucrats, Check users, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, vuser
9,364
edits
Changes
Directory talk:The Wikipedia Point of View/FT2 on Animal Films (view source)
Revision as of 03:15, 28 November 2008
, 03:15, 28 November 2008→Google cache
::: The first - but Wikipedia Review was what I had in mind, not really mainstream. However the link appears to have failed. I'll leave it to your judgment, Greg! Best [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 14:19, 27 November 2008 (PST)
::: The first - but Wikipedia Review was what I had in mind, not really mainstream. However the link appears to have failed. I'll leave it to your judgment, Greg! Best [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 14:19, 27 November 2008 (PST)
::: By the way, it is being identified by the NetSense things as porn - interesting. Are you sure it's Ok to have it on your website? [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 14:19, 27 November 2008 (PST)
::: By the way, it is being identified by the NetSense things as porn - interesting. Are you sure it's Ok to have it on your website? [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 14:19, 27 November 2008 (PST)
::::If it was good enough for the University of California at Santa Cruz to have on their website, how could I possibly be concerned about it on my site? The only thing I think I would ask you to do, though, is to write perhaps an introductory lead-in explaining something to the effect of: "The following content was initially published on DATE on WIKIPEDIA by FT2. The content was later ''oversighted'' by an administrator who possessed the tools to make uncomfortable edits 'disappear' from public view. In fact, there is a Google cache that..." You get my drift.
::::It stinks that the page is getting blocked by WebSense (that's what you meant, right?), but keep in mind -- I'd guess that only about 5% of Internet sessions at any given time are filtered by content blockers. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 19:15, 27 November 2008 (PST)