| Line 335: |
Line 335: |
| | | | |
| | : I have begun [[Wikipedia Review]] here. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 03:22, 13 October 2008 (PDT) | | : I have begun [[Wikipedia Review]] here. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 03:22, 13 October 2008 (PDT) |
| − |
| |
| − | =="Krimpet" coverup==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Let's also observe that Wikipedia Review has covered up the identity of male transvestite [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Krimpet"Krimpet"] (a.k.a. Francis "Francine" S. Rogers,) a Wikipedia administrator known for outing others and attacking their BLPs, by [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=20613&view=findpost&p=135471 deleting an entire thread].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | "Krimpet," like "Poetlister" and others is a male tranvestite pretending to be a woman: [http://people.rit.edu/~fsr3886/], [http://people.rit.edu/~fsr3886/resume.pdf],[http://pear.php.net/user/krimpet], [http://www.linkedin.com/pub/9/541/117]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The reason this was covered up is very likely that "Krimpet", like "Poetlister" and "Homey," opposes SlimVirgin (an actual woman, not a [http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=dd7ss2g_0fshgw6hq&hl=en tranvestite as per the Review's staff]) and Jayjg.[[User:Proabivouac|Proabivouac]] 03:53, 13 October 2008 (PDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : OK how we deal with this is by the MWB 'directory' system. I have created [[Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Wikipedia Review (Criticism)]] which contains any potentially defamatory information. I am responsible for this directory, and only I have passworded access to it. You can create your own directory if you wish. We can share each others' material if we wish. Mainspace material such as [[Wikipedia Review]] must be verifiable and sourced in a similar way to [[Wikipedia]] itself. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 04:04, 13 October 2008 (PDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::Whether KRIMPET, POETLISTER are TRANIES, CROSS DRESSES, DYKE'S OR FAIRES has really no bearing on Wikipeida in so much as These people have hurt others with the way they have used Wikipeida as a weapon of revenge and vindictive pursuits.[[User:Joehazelton|Joehazelton]] 04:35, 13 October 2008 (PDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::: This is why I suggest using the 'Directory' system for such material, if it is felt necessary (I am mildly intrigued by this sort of tabloid material). Reliable, sober and well-sourced material that would be useful to the more respectable journals, and of course to the [[Sloan Foundation]] can go in mainspace. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 04:56, 13 October 2008 (PDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : I've posted a response (of sorts) to these claims [[Directory talk:The Wikipedia Point of View/Wikipedia Review (Criticism)|here]]. ''Enjoy!'' [[User:Sueme|Somey]] 01:11, 30 October 2008 (PDT)
| |