7
edits
Changes
Talk:Criticism of crowdsourcing/Archive 1 (view source)
Revision as of 08:11, 30 October 2008
, 08:11, 30 October 2008→"Krimpet" coverup
::: This is why I suggest using the 'Directory' system for such material, if it is felt necessary (I am mildly intrigued by this sort of tabloid material). Reliable, sober and well-sourced material that would be useful to the more respectable journals, and of course to the [[Sloan Foundation]] can go in mainspace. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 04:56, 13 October 2008 (PDT)
::: This is why I suggest using the 'Directory' system for such material, if it is felt necessary (I am mildly intrigued by this sort of tabloid material). Reliable, sober and well-sourced material that would be useful to the more respectable journals, and of course to the [[Sloan Foundation]] can go in mainspace. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 04:56, 13 October 2008 (PDT)
: I've posted a response (of sorts) to these claims [[Directory talk:The Wikipedia Point of View/Wikipedia Review (Criticism)|here]]. ''Enjoy!'' [[User:Sueme|Somey]] 01:11, 30 October 2008 (PDT)