3,209
edits
Changes
Wikipedia Vandalism Study (view source)
Revision as of 19:51, 13 October 2008
, 19:51, 13 October 2008no edit summary
This is not an issue of “damaged” versus “acceptable” rates. Rather, it is an issue that the [[Directory:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]] allows anonymous editors to append the article about [[Directory:Hillary Clinton|Hillary Clinton]] with “'''hillary needs to die and chop of her penis'''”; or to modify the article about Bob Menendez to say “'''Menendez and Jacobsen have since divorced because he was cheating on her'''”; all without any meaningful effort to change the parameters of editing to disallow this kind of drive-by hatred and libel.
This is not an issue of “damaged” versus “acceptable” rates. Rather, it is an issue that the [[Directory:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]] allows anonymous editors to append the article about [[Directory:Hillary Clinton|Hillary Clinton]] with “'''hillary needs to die and chop of her penis'''”; or to modify the article about Bob Menendez to say “'''Menendez and Jacobsen have since divorced because he was cheating on her'''”; all without any meaningful effort to change the parameters of editing to disallow this kind of drive-by hatred and libel.
== Other examples ==
* For 3399 minutes, the Wikipedia article about Senator Harry Reid of Nevada said that he was "[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Reid&diff=next&oldid=171572544 married to his right hand]". About 1383 people saw the article like this.
* [Teh guy in the Daily Mail - Utley I think - goes for a Google]
== External links ==
== External links ==