67
edits
Changes
Criticism of crowdsourcing (view source)
Revision as of 03:08, 10 October 2008
, 03:08, 10 October 2008→Name ideas: CyberCulture Review
:Internet Concerns
:Internet Concerns
:The Folly of Crowds
:The Folly of Crowds
:CyberCulture Review
One of the reasons that "The Wikipedia Review" has been so successful as a concept is that the name is precise, yet neutral. A successful name will most likely have a neutral, objective(perhaps scientific), element which will not necessarily be seen as being negative towards the subject. It is perhaps more effective to try to remain objective in our criticism, as to let the objective evidence speak for itself.
One of the reasons that "The Wikipedia Review" has been so successful as a concept is that the name is precise, yet neutral. A successful name will most likely have a neutral, objective(perhaps scientific), element which will not necessarily be seen as being negative towards the subject. It is perhaps more effective to try to remain objective in our criticism, as to let the objective evidence speak for itself.