Bureaucrats, Check users, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, vuser
9,362
edits
Changes
Criticism of crowdsourcing (view source)
Revision as of 15:55, 9 October 2008
, 15:55, 9 October 2008Name may not be as important as the concept.
:Wikipedia Analysis (attn: the term "Wikipedia" is copyrighted. Can we use this name? ) or WikiAnalysis
:Wikipedia Analysis (attn: the term "Wikipedia" is copyrighted. Can we use this name? ) or WikiAnalysis
:WikiReader (Americans will remember the "Weekly Reader" from Grade school...although this might not work for an international audience)
:WikiReader (Americans will remember the "Weekly Reader" from Grade school...although this might not work for an international audience)
:Center for Internet Criticism
:Internet Ethics Report
:Internet Concerns
:The Folly of Crowds
One of the reasons that "The Wikipedia Review" has been so successful as a concept is that the name is precise, yet neutral. A successful name will most likely have a neutral, objective(perhaps scientific), element which will not necessarily be seen as being negative towards the subject. It is perhaps more effective to try to remain objective in our criticism, as to let the objective evidence speak for itself.
One of the reasons that "The Wikipedia Review" has been so successful as a concept is that the name is precise, yet neutral. A successful name will most likely have a neutral, objective(perhaps scientific), element which will not necessarily be seen as being negative towards the subject. It is perhaps more effective to try to remain objective in our criticism, as to let the objective evidence speak for itself.
Conversely, even a forum with a lousy name like "Wikback.com" was quite successful for the brief time before its owner began to censor content in haphazard and unethical ways.
==Reserved domain names==
==Reserved domain names==