3,209
edits
Changes
Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/FT2 (view source)
Revision as of 20:43, 18 September 2008
, 20:43, 18 September 2008→The logorrheic thicket of words
* You state that sex with animals is common in certain cultures, but I've lived half my life in different countries in Africa and I even speak an African language, and I can assure you that such practices are neither common nor tolerated
* You state that sex with animals is common in certain cultures, but I've lived half my life in different countries in Africa and I even speak an African language, and I can assure you that such practices are neither common nor tolerated
* FT2, you really are not well versed in this area and perhaps you should get a medical person or epidemiologist to debate this with me.
* FT2, you really are not well versed in this area and perhaps you should get a medical person or epidemiologist to debate this with me.
I stand by what I said. Your edits all tend to minimise perceived risk and your intention is clearly to give the entire topic a gloss of safety and normality, I presume for personal reasons. '''Let me ask you directly: are you a zoophile? We should be told. It would certainly help to explain your edits made without consensus-seeking'''. Skoppensboer 16:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Please stop using pornographic erotica forums for proof of what we should or shouldn't say here. Skoppensboer 16:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
I am of the opinion that your repeated attempts to steer this issue towards a debate about my style as an editor, and way from the actual content of the article, are designed to change the goalposts halfway through the game. You persist in accusing me of a variety of editorial sins while yourself indulging in long-winded denunciations of my person in a way that can only escalate hostility. You have yet to address the fact that you significantly re-wrote the Health and Safety section without any attempt to seek consensus, despite my explicit request for such and despite Zetawoof's friendly participation in that consensus, and despite Zetawoof's agreement to the look of the section as it stood. So really, you are the one whose editorial style needs careful examination rather than I. '''I would hope any mediator would be able to see through the logorrheic thicket of words you spin, with your endless invocations of Wikipedia rules and tenets in a manner designed to cloak you in an aura of righteousness'''. I still await comment on the actual text, and hopefully some will be forthcoming. I suspect you know you are on shaky ground with this, for the text stands up well, hence your refocussing of the discussion with interminable ad hominems. As for taking a break, I'll take a permanent break if you agree not to gut the Health and Safety section again. I am also agreeable to spinning it off as a separate page with a {{main| tag linking it to the Zoophilia page H&S section, as I've offered before, and to which you have never agreed, your recent comment about this notwithstanding. Skoppensboer 05:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Zoophilia&oldid=92371032]
=== NO peer-reviewed published research in this area ===
=== NO peer-reviewed published research in this area ===