3,209
edits
Changes
Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/FT2 (view source)
Revision as of 15:35, 18 September 2008
, 15:35, 18 September 2008→Headley Down
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/FFodor F Fodor] 8 July 2006 - 11 July 2006
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/FFodor F Fodor] 8 July 2006 - 11 July 2006
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Maypole Maypole] 29 April 2007 (68 contributions)
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Maypole Maypole] 29 April 2007 (68 contributions)
=== FFodor ===
Hello all. Most of this article reads well, it is largely balanced and encyclopedic in style but there are a few areas that do read like advocacy. The "Health and Safety" section is quite inconsisent with the balance of the article. What authority contends that humans and animals are anatomically compatible for coitus? Also the sub-section on mis-citation of research is little more than a pre-emptive dimissal of any critical research findings. It too is unsubstantied. I have some references and a brief synpses drawn from the criminology and abnormal psychology literature:
* Duffield G, Hassiotis, Vizard E. Zoophilia in young sexual abusers. Journal Forensic Psychiatry 1998;9;294-304
Finds an assocoaition between zoophilia and mental retardation.
* Williams CJ, Weinberg MS. Zoophilia in men: a study of sexual interest in animals. Arch Sex Behav 2003;32(6):523-35
Finds that exclusively heterosexual men are underrepresented amongst zoophilic men.
* Earls CM, Lalumiere ML. A case study of preferential bestiality (zoophilia) Sex Abuse 2002;14(1):83-8
Reports a case of a zoophilic man that inserted his arm into the vagina of a mare causes her vaginal rupture and subsequent death in response to her interest in a stallion that he had a competitve interst in.
* Ressler RK, Burgess AW, Douglas JE. Sexual homicide: patters & motives. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1988.
Reports that sadistic serial killers have a preference for paraphillic pornography including that depicting zoophilia.
* Prins Herschel, Offenders, Deviants or Patients?, 3rd ed. London, Routledge, 2005 p.233
"Duffield et al. (1998) describe and discuss the cases of seven young patients referred to an adolescent psychiatric service dealing with sex abusers. On the basis of their own study and the work of others, they concluded that bestiality was frequently accompanied by other paraphilias (disorders of sexual preference). In summary, the behaviour is most likely to occur mainly in males who may be mentally disturbed or impaired, be socially isolated, have difficulties in making relationships and showing other forms of sexually deviant behaviour."
As far as I know the resarch based on deviant populations does not specify a causal connection between zoophilia and these populations neurological, endocrinological and psychological deficits. Insead they find an association between zoophilia and these deficits. This is worthy of mention. Also, the ethical dimension of zoophilia isn't given the treatment it deserves. Instead the reader is treated to numerous NAMBLA-esque apologies. The ethical concern is a large one. Singer isn't the only bioethicist with an opinion on zoophilia. There is also a body of research on serial murderers that documents their paraphilias (not all sadistic) and zoophilia is included. -FFodor 12:45, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
I suppose one expects meatpuppet recruitment next. This being the sort of thing HeadleyDown's do. FT2 (Talk | email) 15:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Please. Will the accusation of impersonation and recruitment become your standard response to any editorial contribution that is inconsisntent with your worldview? I can't prove that I'm not someone or that I'm not associated with someone. That is impossible to do. The onus is on you -- the accuser -- to demonstrate that I am part of some mythical cabal or that I am someone you have had previous encounters with. My contributions should be assessed on their own merits just as you expect your own to be. By posting to the discussion first I am trying to be courteous and cooperative. I will proceed with the edits I deem appropriate to balance the article unless you can offer good reasons otherwise. -FFodor 04:53, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Pack it in, Headley/Hartley/whatever name you use next. You are not permitted to edit on this site, under any name, or with any sock, as you well know. Thank you. FT2 (Talk | email) 21:21, 9 July 2006 (UTC) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Zoophilia&oldid=63197650#Suggestions_by_FFodor]
== Skoppensbauer (December 2006) ==
== Skoppensbauer (December 2006) ==