3,209
edits
Changes
Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Wikipaedophilia (view source)
Revision as of 09:19, 13 September 2008
, 09:19, 13 September 2008no edit summary
'''Wikipaedophilia''' is the home from home for pro-paedophile activists (PPA's). "The reason I spend so much time at Wikipedia is that their Paedophilia article is the top result for that term on Google, making it an important platform for us." [http://www.boychat.org/messages/1071772.htm].
'''Wikipaedophilia''' is the home from home for pro-paedophile activists (PPA's). "The reason I spend so much time at Wikipedia is that their Paedophilia article is the top result for that term on Google, making it an important platform for us." [http://www.boychat.org/messages/1071772.htm].
== The Jules Verne Article ==
== The Jules Verne Article ==
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spartan_pederasty Spartan_pederasty]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spartan_pederasty Spartan_pederasty]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theban_pederasty Theban_pederasty]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theban_pederasty Theban_pederasty]
== DPeterson ==
: "The Wikipedia accounts 'DPeterson' and 'RalphLender' have been banned for a period of one year. These accounts, both operated by Arthur Becker-Weidman, an attachment therapist notorious for pushing his unsupported views on a range of subjects including paedophilia and child sexual abuse. His other sockpuppets (MarkWood, JonesRD, SamDavidson, and JohnsonRon) have been blocked indefinitely." [http://www.boychat.org/messages/1088517.htm]
See [[Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Dpeterson | Dpeterson]]
== Historical Pederastic couples ==
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=226707130#Unusual_action_by_admin_FCYTravis July 2008] ANI discussion of an administrator who deleted the appalling article [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_pederastic_couples Historical_pederastic_couples].
"Admin FCYTravis has just deleted the article Historical pederastic couples, in spite of the fact that it just survived an AFd. I find this action unusual, to say the least, ands would like input from other admins and the community as a whole. One person's distaste for an article must not take precedent over a sourced article and lack of consensus, which was divided 60/40. Jeffpw (talk) 20:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)"
* The need to attack other editors at the same time. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=226870434], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=prev&oldid=226865920]
* Pro-pederasty collaboration (canvassing?) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Haiduc&diff=prev&oldid=226828851]
* upset about not getting the requisite pro pederasty editor support? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=prev&oldid=226828539]
* rather one-sided view of libel (pro pederast side) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=226824572]
* Very upset [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_LGBT_studies&diff=prev&oldid=226823929]
* Denial of significant views [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=226795815]
Just a cursory look at the literature shows a significant view that Shively is a NAMBLA advocate man/boy love advocate heckled at cornell Gay Community News. Boston: May 12, 1984. Vol. 11, Iss. 42; pg. 2
“NAMBLA also co-sponsored Shively's visit”
They must be conservative, and the yuk brigade, therefore unworthy? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=226823790]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_July_20&diff=prev&oldid=226822843]
looking for blood [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=226772253]