Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| The purpose of the ERB is to reward the work of patient, thoughtful contributors who understand the importance and value of adding high-quality, [[Neutral point-of-view]] (NPOV) content to Centiare, but who wish to see the fruit of their work go undisturbed by other editors. | | The purpose of the ERB is to reward the work of patient, thoughtful contributors who understand the importance and value of adding high-quality, [[Neutral point-of-view]] (NPOV) content to Centiare, but who wish to see the fruit of their work go undisturbed by other editors. |
| | | |
− | The Editorial Review Board will look for and expect three important criteria to be filled by nominated pages: | + | The Editorial Review Board will look for and expect four important criteria to be filled by nominated pages: |
| | | |
| # The topic shall be about an entity, action, event, or process that '''does ''not'' have standing in a court of law'''. | | # The topic shall be about an entity, action, event, or process that '''does ''not'' have standing in a court of law'''. |
| # The article shall include multiple relevant, accurate '''reference citations''' to noteworthy publications. | | # The article shall include multiple relevant, accurate '''reference citations''' to noteworthy publications. |
| # Any personal conflict of interest or bias of the author shall be deprecated in favor of a '''neutral point-of-view'''. | | # Any personal conflict of interest or bias of the author shall be deprecated in favor of a '''neutral point-of-view'''. |
| + | # Content '''must not plagiarize''' other published works; except that the author(s) of the article may reconstitute their own previous copyrighted material, if they choose. |
| | | |
| '''Main Space''' articles meeting these criteria may be nominated by their primary author(s) to the ERB on this project's [[Centiare_talk:Editorial Review Board|Discussion page]]. Every weekend, the Board will consider each active nomination and either approve the article as a "winner", return it for additional improvements, or reject it. | | '''Main Space''' articles meeting these criteria may be nominated by their primary author(s) to the ERB on this project's [[Centiare_talk:Editorial Review Board|Discussion page]]. Every weekend, the Board will consider each active nomination and either approve the article as a "winner", return it for additional improvements, or reject it. |