3,209
edits
Changes
Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Wikipaedophilia (view source)
Revision as of 08:06, 21 July 2008
, 08:06, 21 July 2008no edit summary
"Admin FCYTravis has just deleted the article Historical pederastic couples, in spite of the fact that it just survived an AFd. I find this action unusual, to say the least, ands would like input from other admins and the community as a whole. One person's distaste for an article must not take precedent over a sourced article and lack of consensus, which was divided 60/40. Jeffpw (talk) 20:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)"
"Admin FCYTravis has just deleted the article Historical pederastic couples, in spite of the fact that it just survived an AFd. I find this action unusual, to say the least, ands would like input from other admins and the community as a whole. One person's distaste for an article must not take precedent over a sourced article and lack of consensus, which was divided 60/40. Jeffpw (talk) 20:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)"
The need to attack other editors at the same time.
* The need to attack other editors at the same time. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=226870434], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=prev&oldid=226865920]
* Pro-pederasty collaboration (canvassing?) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Haiduc&diff=prev&oldid=226828851]
* Pro-pederasty collaboration (canvassing?) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Haiduc&diff=prev&oldid=226828851]
* upset about not getting the requisite pro pederasty editor support? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=prev&oldid=226828539]
* upset about not getting the requisite pro pederasty editor support? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=prev&oldid=226828539]