Changes

=====Politics of Language Standardisation, Nationalistic and Communist Ideologies =====

=====Politics of Language Standardisation, Nationalistic and Communist Ideologies =====

The ''politics'' of language standardisation is the issue at heart when it comes to the telling the story of Southern Slavic languages.  In the 19th century Slavic language standardisation entered into the mix.<ref>Other languages commonly used in the region included, Romance Dalmatian, Old Venetian, [[Hungary|Hungarians (Magyars)]] and written [[Latin]].</ref>  The question should be asked.  

The ''politics'' of language standardisation is the issue at heart when it comes to the telling of the story of Southern Slavic languages.  In the 19th century, Slavic language standardisation entered into the mix.<ref>Other languages commonly used in the region included, Romance Dalmatian, Old Venetian, [[Hungary|Hungarians (Magyars)]] and written [[Latin]].</ref>  The question should be asked.  

''Did the 19th century scholars and linguist do their research scientifically or were they seriously influenced by the politics of the future 19 century super Southern Slavic State?''  

''Did the 19th century scholars and linguists do their research scientifically or were they seriously influenced by the politics of the 19th Century Pan Slavic movement?''  

In this editors opinion, the answer is ''yes'' -  they where very seriously influenced by the politics of creating a future 19th century super Southern Slavic State. With this in mind the linguist of the day created a construct Serbo-Croatian language with a Shtokavian base.  

In this editors opinion, the answer is ''yes'' -  they where very seriously influenced by the politics of the Pan-Slavic movement? The Pan slavic movement was heavily influenced by European Imperialism with an overriding attitude directed towards creating a unifying language that negated the history of the various souther slavic language bases that made up the Balkans and further areas bordering the Balkans. With this in mind the linguist of the day created a construct Serbo-Croatian language with a Shtokavian base.  

In 1918 a construct Serbo-Croatian language was introduced as government policy with the creation of Yugoslavia.  Before Yugoslavia came  into being the policy was first started to be implemented by Austro-Hungarian Empire in the west and the east the Kingdom of Serbia.

In 1918 a construct Serbo-Croatian language was introduced by government policy as the main language to be used within the created state of Yugoslavia.  Before Yugoslavia was established the policy had already started to be implemented by the Austro-Hungarian Empire in the west and it was also being implemented in the east in the Kingdom of Serbia.

   

   

There appears to be a common misconception that if you are taught and you learn to speak the standardised Serbo-Croatian language that you have historical connections to an particular ethnic group. This is not necessarily factual as many other ethnic groups, with various ethnic backgrounds, that were caught up in this system of standardisation where being forced to speak a ''common  standardised language'' (Serbo-Croatian). This does not necessarily directly related to the actual ancestry and ethnic history of the speaker.  

There appears to be a common misconception in the former Yugoslavian regions that if you are taught and you learn to speak the standardised Serbo-Croatian language that you have historical connections to a particular ethnic group. This is not necessarily factual as many other ethnic groups, with various ethnic backgrounds, were caught up in this system of standardisation. These people were being forced to speak a ''common  standardised language'' (Serbo-Croatian). This does not accurately reflect the actual ancestry and ethnic history of the speaker.  

Another important question to ask is '''how far''' back does one go in proclaiming Croatian nationhood or any other nationhood? In the past the Yugoslav Communist party, Pan-Slavists and the Croatian Nationalistic movements have taken this to extremes. These Pan-Slaviic, Nationalistic and Communist ideologies have created so much pain, destruction and falsehoods by clinging to these false beliefs.  

Another important question to ask is '''how far''' back does one go in proclaiming Croatian nationhood or any other nationhood? In the past the Yugoslav Communist party, Pan-Slavists and the Croatian Nationalistic movements have taken this to extremes. These Pan-Slavic, Nationalistic and Communist ideologies, regarding language, ethnicity and history that are  clinging to these false beliefs of a single nationhood have created a great deal of pain, destruction and falsehoods.  

For example does a seventh generation [[Australia|Australian]] with English background start saying in modern Australia that he is a '''Saxon''' and start a nationalistic movement to assert his beliefs upon others.

For example does a seventh generation [[Australia|Australian]] with English background start saying in modern Australia that he is a '''Saxon''' and start a nationalistic movement to assert his beliefs upon others.