95
edits
Changes
→Potentially defamatory claim
If you are going to say that someone [http://mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia_Review&diff=464872&oldid=128176 illegally took control of a site], then it should be substantiated with ironclad documentation, preferably third-party. I cannot have MyWikiBiz being used to propagate libel. Amend your content immediately, please. - [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] ([[User talk:MyWikiBiz|talk]]) 16:07, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
If you are going to say that someone [http://mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia_Review&diff=464872&oldid=128176 illegally took control of a site], then it should be substantiated with ironclad documentation, preferably third-party. I cannot have MyWikiBiz being used to propagate libel. Amend your content immediately, please. - [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] ([[User talk:MyWikiBiz|talk]]) 16:07, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
:That isn't libel. It is fact. The documentation is no longer available, but it was displayed previously. I am the legitimate owner of Wikipedia Review. It was hacked. [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] ([[User talk:Blissyu2|talk]]) 23:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC)