Changes

Most of the time a typical Wikipediot is a well established [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedians Wikipedian], often an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators administrator]. A typical Wikipediot is usually obsessed with his self-righteous authority, and in most cases is a bully. A typical Wikipediot sees his purpose in enforcing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines Wikipedia policies] no matter how stupid and how irrelevant they are, and sincerely believes there's no life outside Wikipedia. A typical Wikipediot will submit to no expert, no matter how famous one is, because [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=205586789 "One may be an expert in one's field, but not an expert in collaborative, volunteer development of an open encyclopedia using wiki software. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)"]

Most of the time a typical Wikipediot is a well established [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedians Wikipedian], often an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators administrator]. A typical Wikipediot is usually obsessed with his self-righteous authority, and in most cases is a bully. A typical Wikipediot sees his purpose in enforcing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines Wikipedia policies] no matter how stupid and how irrelevant they are, and sincerely believes there's no life outside Wikipedia. A typical Wikipediot will submit to no expert, no matter how famous one is, because [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=205586789 "One may be an expert in one's field, but not an expert in collaborative, volunteer development of an open encyclopedia using wiki software. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)"]

A typical Wikipediot has difficulties expressing himself in English. Instead he speaks a language of Wikipedia policies, for example: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGwen_Gale&action=historysubmit&diff=346214235&oldid=346208135 “PoV is allowed, so long as WP:NPOV and WP:Consensus are given sway. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:09, 25 February 2010 (UTC) “]. Don’t even try to understand what does “PoV is allowed, so long as WP:NPOV blah, blah, blah” means, but WP:Consensus basically means that a typical Wikipediot strongly believes that Wikipedia articles should be edited in accordance with an equal collaboration of the ignorant and the educated. Sometimes a typical Wikipediot says something that is hard to understand even to another typical Wikipediots: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Reviewing&diff=368292310&oldid=368292188 "PC is a protection tool against V, CV, LT/PAs/libel and BLP,....Gwen Gale (talk) 01:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)"]

A typical Wikipediot has difficulties expressing himself in English. Instead he speaks a language of Wikipedia policies, for example: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGwen_Gale&action=historysubmit&diff=346214235&oldid=346208135 “PoV is allowed, so long as WP:NPOV and WP:Consensus are given sway. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:09, 25 February 2010 (UTC) “]. Don’t even try to understand what does “PoV is allowed, so long as WP:NPOV blah, blah, blah” means, but WP:Consensus basically means that a typical Wikipediot strongly believes that Wikipedia articles should be edited in accordance with an equal collaboration of the ignorant and the educated. Sometimes a typical Wikipediot says something that is hard to understand even to another typical Wikipediots: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Reviewing&diff=368292310&oldid=368292188 "PC is a protection tool against V, CV, LT/PAs/libel and BLP,....Gwen Gale (talk) 01:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)"]