Line 7,815: |
Line 7,815: |
| Relative to a setting of this kind, the rules of sequential inference are exemplified by the schematism shown in Table 41. | | Relative to a setting of this kind, the rules of sequential inference are exemplified by the schematism shown in Table 41. |
| | | |
− | <pre> | + | <br> |
− | Table 41. Schematism of Sequential Inference | + | |
− | Initial Differential Inferred
| + | {| align="center" border="1" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:center; width:80%" |
− | Premiss Premiss Sequel
| + | |+ style="height:30px" | |
− | x @ t dx @ t (x) @ t'
| + | <math>\text{Table 69.} ~~ \text{Schematism of Sequential Inference}\!</math> |
− | x @ t (dx) @ t x @ t'
| + | |- style="height:40px; background:#f0f0ff" |
− | (x) @ t dx @ t x @ t'
| + | | width="33%" | <math>\text{Initial Premiss}\!</math> |
− | (x) @ t (dx) @ t (x) @ t'
| + | | width="33%" | <math>\text{Differential Premiss}\!</math> |
− | </pre> | + | | width="33%" | <math>\text{Inferred Sequel}\!</math> |
| + | |- |
| + | | valign="bottom" | |
| + | <math>\begin{matrix} |
| + | ~x~ ~\operatorname{at}~ t |
| + | \\[4pt] |
| + | ~x~ ~\operatorname{at}~ t |
| + | \\[4pt] |
| + | (x) ~\operatorname{at}~ t |
| + | \\[4pt] |
| + | (x) ~\operatorname{at}~ t |
| + | \end{matrix}</math> |
| + | | valign="bottom" | |
| + | <math>\begin{matrix} |
| + | ~\operatorname{d}x~ ~\operatorname{at}~ t |
| + | \\[4pt] |
| + | (\operatorname{d}x) ~\operatorname{at}~ t |
| + | \\[4pt] |
| + | ~\operatorname{d}x~ ~\operatorname{at}~ t |
| + | \\[4pt] |
| + | (\operatorname{d}x) ~\operatorname{at}~ t |
| + | \end{matrix}</math> |
| + | | valign="bottom" | |
| + | <math>\begin{matrix} |
| + | (x) ~\operatorname{at}~ t' |
| + | \\[4pt] |
| + | ~x~ ~\operatorname{at}~ t' |
| + | \\[4pt] |
| + | ~x~ ~\operatorname{at}~ t' |
| + | \\[4pt] |
| + | (x) ~\operatorname{at}~ t' |
| + | \end{matrix}</math> |
| + | |} |
| + | |
| + | <br> |
| | | |
| It might be thought that a notion of real time <math>(t \in \mathbb{R})\!</math> is needed at this point to fund the account of sequential processes. From a logical point of view, however, I think it will be found that it is precisely out of such data that the notion of time has to be constructed. | | It might be thought that a notion of real time <math>(t \in \mathbb{R})\!</math> is needed at this point to fund the account of sequential processes. From a logical point of view, however, I think it will be found that it is precisely out of such data that the notion of time has to be constructed. |