For ease of reference, I introduce the following terminology. With respect to the empirical dimension, a ''good'' POSR is described as an ''exculpable self-reference'' (ESR) while a ''bad'' POSR is described as an ''indictable self-reference'' (ISR). With respect to the intuitive dimension, a ''good'' POSR is depicted as an ''explicative self-reference'' (ESR) while a ''bad'' POSR is depicted as an ''implicative self-reference'' (ISR). Here, underscored acronyms are used to mark the provisionally settled, hypothetically tentative, or status quo condition of these casually intuitive categories.
<pre>
<pre>
−
For ease of repeated reference, I introduce the following terminology. With respect to the empirical dimension, a "good" POSR is described as an "exculpable self-reference" (ESR) while a "bad" POSR is described as an "indictable self-reference" (ISR). With respect to the intuitive dimension, a "good" POSR is depicted as an "explicative self-reference" (ESR) while a "bad" POSR is depicted as an "implicative self-reference" (ISR). Here, underscored acronyms are used to mark the provisionally settled, hypothetically tentative, or "status quo" status of these casually intuitive categories.
−
These categories of POSRs can be discussed in greater detail as follows:
These categories of POSRs can be discussed in greater detail as follows: