I make one more remark to emphasize the importance of this issue, and then return to the main discussion. Even though there is no great difficulty in conceiving the sign <math>{}^{\backprime\backprime} x_i {}^{\prime\prime}\!</math> to be interpreted as denoting different types of objects in different contexts, it is more of a problem to imagine that the same object <math>x_i\!</math> can literally be both a value (in <math>\mathbb{B}\!</math>) and a function (from <math>\mathbb{B}^n\!</math> to <math>\mathbb{B}\!</math>). | I make one more remark to emphasize the importance of this issue, and then return to the main discussion. Even though there is no great difficulty in conceiving the sign <math>{}^{\backprime\backprime} x_i {}^{\prime\prime}\!</math> to be interpreted as denoting different types of objects in different contexts, it is more of a problem to imagine that the same object <math>x_i\!</math> can literally be both a value (in <math>\mathbb{B}\!</math>) and a function (from <math>\mathbb{B}^n\!</math> to <math>\mathbb{B}\!</math>). |