Changes

Line 2,633: Line 2,633:  
But it is important to remember that the full intention of this factious formulation is more analogous to an interpretive doubling of vision, an amplification of resolving power and a coordination of perspectives, than it is to an objective division of being, a substantial disconnection of essentials or a disintegration of being.  Even when the factions of the term <math>y \cdot y</math> are conceived in practice to be implemented by substantially different parts of the same agency, constitutionally they embody but a single power.
 
But it is important to remember that the full intention of this factious formulation is more analogous to an interpretive doubling of vision, an amplification of resolving power and a coordination of perspectives, than it is to an objective division of being, a substantial disconnection of essentials or a disintegration of being.  Even when the factions of the term <math>y \cdot y</math> are conceived in practice to be implemented by substantially different parts of the same agency, constitutionally they embody but a single power.
   −
<pre>
+
{| align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="90%"
Before long I too began to ask myself why.
+
|
Daniel Quinn, Ishmael, [DQ, 11]
+
<p>Before long I too began to ask myself ''why''.</p>
 +
|-
 +
| align="right" | Daniel Quinn, ''Ishmael'', [DQ, 11]
 +
|}
   −
The form of inquiry into inquiry, y.y, requires that any power assumed on the part of the right is open to be indicted on the part of the left.  This entails that any power arrogated for the ends of inquiry has to be given a name, not only under which it is invoked as an executive power, but also by which it is entered on the agenda of issues to inquire into, and finally through which it is indicted for submission to all the powers of inquiry that be.  This combination of "appellation" and "supplication", or "nomination for" and "submission to" the jurisdiction of a reflexive application, makes up a large part of what is usually called "reflection".
+
The form of inquiry into inquiry, <math>y \cdot y,</math> requires that any power assumed on the part of the right is open to be indicted on the part of the left.  This entails that any power arrogated for the ends of inquiry has to be given a name, not only under which it is invoked as an executive power, but also by which it is entered on the agenda of issues to inquire into, and finally through which it is indicted for submission to all the powers of inquiry that be.  This combination of ''appellation'' and ''supplication'', or ''nomination for'' and ''submission to'' the jurisdiction of a reflexive application, makes up a large part of what is usually called ''reflection''.
    +
<pre>
 
Being neurologically far in advance of the tiger, I was able to examine what I meant by the question, at least in a rudimentary way.
 
Being neurologically far in advance of the tiger, I was able to examine what I meant by the question, at least in a rudimentary way.
 
Daniel Quinn, Ishmael, [DQ, 11]
 
Daniel Quinn, Ishmael, [DQ, 11]
12,080

edits