Changes

The case against Gwen Gale (view source)

Revision as of 17:22, 30 January 2012

1,967 bytes added , 17:22, 30 January 2012

→‎Gwen Gale using her administrative tools when involved

Line 126: Line 126:

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3AScias76 On May 12, 2010 Gwen Gale blocked Scias76] for edit warring. Gwen Gale was involved in edit warring of this very article herself. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hummus&action=historysubmit&diff=357403536&oldid=357400663 She] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hummus&action=historysubmit&diff=357451756&oldid=357449920 reverted] a few editors [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hummus&action=historysubmit&diff=357829370&oldid=357828550 including the one she later blocked.]

+

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive141#User:Gwen_Gale_reported_by_User:John_J._Bulten_.28Result:_protected.29 On October 1, 2010 Gwen Gale was reported for edit warring].

+

:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Magog_the_Ogre Administrator Magog the Ogre Magog the Ogre] had this to say about Gwen's conduct:

+

{{cquote|Gwen is very very much out of line, not only with the rollback tool but threatening to block a user in a dispute: future edit warring of this type will receive a block.}}

+

:After Gwen Gale yet another time dishonestly claimed a good faith edit to be "vandalism" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HJ_Mitchell administrator HJ Mitchell] had this to say about Gwen's conduct:

+

{{cquote|In this case, while it might not have been your intention to get into a dispute, you did step over the bright-line rule and, as far as I can see, none of the reverted edits were vandalism. I would suggest being more careful with rollback at the very least. Non-admins have been known to lose it for less. In this case, while it might not have been your intention to get into a dispute, you did step over the bright-line rule and, as far as I can see, none of the reverted edits were vandalism. I would suggest being more careful with rollback at the very least. Non-admins have been known to lose it for less. }}

+

:Gwen also received a personal message about this incident.

+

{{cquote|[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gwen_Gale/archive18#3RR_violation_.2B_misuse_of_admin_tools '''3RR violation + misuse of admin tools'''.Please see WP:AN3#User:Gwen Gale reported by User:John J. Bulten (Result: protected). I am also rescinding the warning you gave the user you were opposed to, and replacing it with a proper warning for edit warring. Please consider this a warning: if you believe it is inappropriate and/or would like to appeal it, you may take it to WP:ANI. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:17, 2 October 2010 (UTC)]}}

+

Kolobok

236

edits