Changes

|}

|}

The common proposition that concludes each argument is ''AC'', to wit, "contributing to charity is wise".

The common proposition that concludes each argument is ''AC'', to wit, “contributing to charity is wise”.

Deduction could have obtained the Fact ''AC'' from the Rule ''AB'', "benevolence is wisdom", along with the Case ''BC'', "contributing to charity is benevolent".

Deduction could have obtained the Fact ''AC'' from the Rule ''AB'', “benevolence is wisdom”, along with the Case ''BC'', “contributing to charity is benevolent”.

Induction could have gathered the Rule ''AC'', after a manner of saying that "contributing to charity is exemplary of wisdom", from the Fact ''AE'', "the act of earlier today is wise", along with the Case ''CE'', "the act of earlier today was an instance of contributing to charity".

Induction could have gathered the Rule ''AC'', after a manner of saying that “contributing to charity is exemplary of wisdom”, from the Fact ''AE'', “the act of earlier today is wise”, along with the Case ''CE'', “the act of earlier today was an instance of contributing to charity”.

Abduction could have guessed the Case ''AC'', in a style of expression stating that "contributing to charity is explained by wisdom", from the Fact ''DC'', "contributing to charity is done by this wise man", and the Rule ''DA'', "everything that is wise is done by this wise man".  Thus, a wise man, who happens to do all of the wise things that there are to do, may nevertheless contribute to charity for no good reason, and even be known to be charitable to a fault.  But all of this notwithstanding, on seeing the wise man contribute to charity we may find it natural to conjecture, in effect, to consider it as a possibility worth examining further, that charity is indeed a mark of his wisdom, and not just the accidental trait or the immaterial peculiarity of his character — in essence, that wisdom is the "reason" that he contributes to charity.

Abduction could have guessed the Case ''AC'', in a style of expression stating that “contributing to charity is explained by wisdom”, from the Fact ''DC'', “contributing to charity is done by this wise man”, and the Rule ''DA'', “everything that is wise is done by this wise man”.  Thus, a wise man, who happens to do all of the wise things that there are to do, may nevertheless contribute to charity for no good reason, and even be known to be charitable to a fault.  But all of this notwithstanding, on seeing the wise man contribute to charity we may find it natural to conjecture, in effect, to consider it as a possibility worth examining further, that charity is indeed a mark of his wisdom, and not just the accidental trait or the immaterial peculiarity of his character — in essence, that wisdom is the ''reason'' he contributes to charity.

===1.3. Comparison of the Analyses===

===1.3. Comparison of the Analyses===