Changes

→‎Definitions: del merged text
Line 148: Line 148:     
======Definitions======
 
======Definitions======
  −
<pre>
  −
Definition 2
  −
  −
If X, Y c U,
  −
  −
then the following are equivalent:
  −
  −
D2a. X = Y.
  −
  −
D2b. u C X  <=>  u C Y, for all u C U.
  −
</pre>
  −
  −
<pre>
  −
Definition 3
  −
  −
If f, g : U -> V,
  −
  −
then the following are equivalent:
  −
  −
D3a. f = g.
  −
  −
D3b. f(u) = g(u), for all u C U.
  −
</pre>
  −
  −
<pre>
  −
Definition 4
  −
  −
If X c U,
  −
  −
then the following are identical subsets of UxB:
  −
  −
D4a. {X}
  −
  −
D4b. {< u, v> C UxB : v = [u C X]}
  −
</pre>
      
<pre>
 
<pre>
Line 199: Line 163:  
</pre>
 
</pre>
   −
Given an indexed set of sentences, Sj for j C J, it is possible to consider the logical conjunction of the corresponding propositions.  Various notations for this concept are be useful in various contexts, a sufficient sample of which are recorded in Definition 6.
  −
  −
<pre>
  −
Definition 6
  −
  −
If Sj is a sentence
  −
  −
about things in the universe U,
  −
  −
for all j C J,
  −
  −
then the following are equivalent:
  −
  −
D6a. Sj, for all j C J.
  −
  −
D6b. For all j C J, Sj.
  −
  −
D6c. Conj(j C J) Sj.
  −
  −
D6d. ConjJ,j Sj.
  −
  −
D6e. ConjJj Sj.
  −
</pre>
      
<pre>
 
<pre>
Definition 7
  −
  −
If S, T are sentences
  −
  −
about things in the universe U,
  −
  −
then the following are equivalent:
  −
  −
D7a. S <=> T.
  −
  −
D7b. [S] = [T].
  −
</pre>
      
======Other Rules======
 
======Other Rules======
12,080

edits