Changes

Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Wikipaedophilia/Boy Scouts are for spanking (view source)

Revision as of 08:16, 12 May 2010

3 bytes removed , 08:16, 12 May 2010

→‎'You guys are arguing against freedom'

Line 31: Line 31:

The complaints sparked the usual protests from the 'free culture' movement on Wales page.

−

:You're missing a detail here. Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia. When that photos was uploaded under free use, it became property of anyone and everyone. Uploading it as a free image says "I don't care who uses this and how they use this, as long as we're credited under the GFDL. So, every photo on Wikipedia can be "twisted and exploited" in the long run. Metros (talk) 03:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...for_spanking.3F]

+

:"You're missing a detail here. Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia. When that photos was uploaded under free use, it became property of anyone and everyone. Uploading it as a free image says "I don't care who uses this and how they use this, as long as we're credited under the GFDL. So, every photo on Wikipedia can be "twisted and exploited" in the long run". Metros (talk) 03:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...for_spanking.3F]

:You guys are arguing against freedom. Against free speech. Against free culture. Against the free reuse of media. Against WikiMedia and Wikipedia. Go sell your love of slavery elsewhere. User:WAS 4.250 22:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Line 39: Line 39:

:"I don't understand how copyright and honoring the ethics of personal privacy, especially of pre-pubescent minors, are somehow antithetical to "freedom". People are also "free" to organize boycotts of Amazon.com (#1 investor in Wikia) and to organize boycotts of donating to Wikimedia Foundation. Let's take a poll -- which do you think would win out in the court of public opinion? The fight for copyleft freedom, or the fight against online sites that promote a pro-pedophilia and pro-child-abuse agenda? Choose your sides, people. This is going to be a quick, decisive battle. - Where I chillax (talk) 17:08, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

−

::'''Are you making threats?'''EconomicsGuy (talk) 17:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

+

::"'''Are you making threats?'''"EconomicsGuy (talk) 17:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

−

:Are you daft? Do you not know the difference between the words "moral" and "legal"? How could you possibly respond to what I wrote with what you wrote, unless you are utterly trying to deflect this discussion to some arcane aspect of the situation that you can "win"? I'm done with trying to engage in finding a solution here. Let the authorities and the lawyers figure it out. I'm sure that perverted individuals who are exploiting youngsters will win the day. ~~- -~~ Where I chillax (talk) 19:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

+

:"Are you daft? Do you not know the difference between the words "moral" and "legal"? How could you possibly respond to what I wrote with what you wrote, unless you are utterly trying to deflect this discussion to some arcane aspect of the situation that you can "win"? I'm done with trying to engage in finding a solution here. Let the authorities and the lawyers figure it out. I'm sure that perverted individuals who are exploiting youngsters will win the day." Where I chillax (talk) 19:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

−

::At what point are we ready to say this thread constitutes a legal threat and '''deal with it accordingly'''? EconomicsGuy ~~(talk)~~ 19:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

+

::"At what point are we ready to say this thread constitutes a legal threat and '''deal with it accordingly'''?" EconomicsGuy 19:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

==Removal of the wiki==

Ockham

3,209

edits