Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | x
| + | {| border=1 cellpadding=10 |
| + | !valign = top width=46%|Latin |
| + | !valign = top width=54%|English |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | |- valign = top |
| + | ||'''Pars I CAP. 1. DE DEFINITIONE TERMINI ET EIUS DIVISIONE IN GENERALI''' |
| + | || Part I, chapter 1. Of the definition of the term and of its division in general |
| + | |- valign = top |
| + | |
| + | || (i) Omnes logicae tractatores intendunt astruere quod argumenta ex propositionibus et propositiones ex terminis componuntur. Unde terminus aliud non est quam pars propinqua propositionis. Definiens enim terminum Aristoteles, I Priorum, dicit: "Terminum voco in quem resolvitur propositio, ut praedicatum et de quo praedicatur, vel apposito vel diviso esse vel non esse". |
| + | |
| + | || All those who treat logic try to show that arguments are put together out of propositions and propositions out of terms. Thus a term is nothing else but a proximate part of a proposition. For, defining a term in ''[[Prior Analytics]]'' I, [[Aristotle]] says "I call a term [that] into which a proposition is resolved, i.e. the predicate and that of which it is predicated, either by what is conjoined or disjoined, [expressing] what is the case or is not. |
| + | |} |
| + | |
| + | [[Category:Logic Museum Parallel Texts]] |