Portuguese Wikipedia governance issues
This page is intended to lead to the identification of the Portuguese Wikipedia governance issues that have been thwarting the Portuguese Wikipedia and appropriate solutions to those problems.
Wikimedia Forum: Contributions are most welcome to the discussion and search for improvements to a problem which far exceeds a single Wikimedia project. Suggestions of other ongoing related projects would also be highly appreciated.
Please use either the English or Portuguese sections of the talk page for debate.
Wikimedia Public Policy Initiative
Background material
- Governance
- Governance reform
- Wikipedia Governance
- Conflicting Wikipedia philosophies
- Wiki personality type
- Wikipedia sociology
- Wikipedia:en:Governance reform
- Wikipedia:en:Governance review
- Wikipedia:en:If you could re-write the rules
- Wikipedia:en:Criticism of Wikipedia#Criticism of the community
- Wikipedia:en:Criticisms
- Wikipedia:en:Replies to common objections (only this one is available in pt)
- Wikipedia:en:Why Wikipedia is not so great
- Wikipedia:en:Why Wikipedia is so great
- Wikipedia:en:Wikipedia is failing
- Wikipedia:en:Wikipedia is succeeding
Meta
External links
- Is something fundamentally wrong with Wikipedia governance processes? (2008 01 07 to present)
- Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View (2008 to present)
- Wikipedia Review: Opinions and Editorials (2007 07 to present)
- Top 10 Reasons Not to Donate to Wikipedia Wikipedia has too much power (2007 to present)
- Top 10 Reasons Not to Donate to Wikipedia Wikipedia is more a roleplaying game than an encyclopedia (2007 to present)
- Directory:Wikimedia Foundation/Grand Donors (2007 to present)
- Critical views of Wikipedia (2006 to present)
- Who here actually contributes to wikipedia articles? (2010 08 05 to 2010 09)
- Is Wikipedia a Cult? Wikipedia strikes back (2010 06 16)
- Tech cult No. 3: The High Priests of Wikipedia (2010 06 07)
- The Wikipedia Cult (2010 05 28)
- The Wikipedia Cult (2010 05 28)
- Corruption of Wikipedia (2010)
- The Wikipedia's Sins Revisited (2009 08 28)
- The Six Rotten Pillars of Wikipedia Bad governance– the reign of the lords of misrule (2008 10 30 to 2009 05 17)
- The Governance Model of Wikipedia: A review of Wikipedia's popular practice of blocking and banning adversarial editors (2009 01 27)
- Wikipedia needs a business model not donations: plead for business model (2009)
- Wikipedia scandals Essjay is not a professor (2007 to 2009)
- Wikipedia scandals Heidi Wyss editing as Gwen Gale (2007 to 2009)
- Wikipedia scandals David Boothroyd, sockpuppet admin (2007 to 2009)
- Law Lord (2008 12 21 to 28)
- Knol: So The Pushiest Loudmouths Don't Always Win (2008 07 31)
- User:Filll/Disgusted (2008 06 30)
- Wikipedia's school for scandal has plenty more secrets to reveal (2008 03 27)
- Criticism of Wikipedia (2008)
- WikiChix (2006? to 2008?)
- Parker Peters (2007 01 15 to 12 07)
- The Wikipedia - Can Teenagers write an Encyclopedia? (2007 07 31)
- In Wikipedia we trust? (2007 05 23)
- Sand Castles of Knowledge (2007 05 05 to 14)
- Idea of Paid Entries Roils Wikipedia (2007 01 25)
- He's the "God-King," but you can call him Jimbo (2007 01 15)
- Wikitruth (from? to 2007?)
- Google-Wikipedia-MySpace - How Teenagers Hijacked the Internet (2006 10 19)
- Wikipedia and the Credibility of Online Information (2006 07 12)
- The Six Sins of the Wikipedia (2006 07 02)
- Nature mag cooked Wikipedia study: Britannica hits back at junk science (2006 03 23)
- Antiwikipedia 2 (2006)
- The Book Stops Here (2005 03)
- Antiwikipedia (2005)
- Wikipedia Watch (from? to?)
- Why Wikipedia Must Jettison Its Anti-Elitism (2004)
- Wiki Patterns
- Meatball Wiki
- Video
- Wikipedia: an introduction (2010 11 18)
- Wikipedia: an introduction, part II (2010 11 24)
- Wikipedia: an introduction, part III (2010 11 29)
- Wikipedia: an introduction, part IV (2010 12 05)