Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/TBP

Evidence of socking

FT2 tacitly admits to being User:TBP on an earlier version of his user page [1]. He brags "Created (or effectively rewritten) from scratch: [ ... ] [2] ... [3] [ ... ]" Both were created and substantially written by TBP, with only minor input from the FT2 account[4]. ^[1] The contribution of the FT2 account was one sentence [5]. By contrast the TBP account created and expanded the article nearly into its present form [6]
FT2 denies the account was his, on his talk page [7].

FT2 and TBP working one after another. FT2 mitigating bestial activities [8]
Working on the same section as FT2 at the same time: [9], [10]
Working on the same paragraph within the same 24 hours: [11]
FT2 using TBP to remove sourced information about the low IQ etc of zoophiles [12]
Pushing for normality of sexual attraction to animals (unsourced) [13]
Pushing for zoosexuality (another fringe way of normalizing bestiality): [14]
Working consequently on zoosadism article [15]
Working on the same line in Rainbow Bridge article [16], [17]
Working on the same issues of the emotion in animals article [18]
Working on the ethology article, one diff after another [19]
Working on FT2’s favorite pro-zoo researcher on the same sentence [20], [21]

More diffs one after another
- TPB makes a statement about being trained by top NLP promoters. [22]
- TBP giving FT2's reply: [23], [24], [25]
Defending TBP as a sockpuppet in the NLP discussion, but not admitting to sockpuppetry. [26]. He says "One editor, User:TBP, was explicitly self-identified as a sock puppet on his talk page before becoming involved in this article Oct 17 DIFF. He played no part in the vote or its discussion, and only a minor role in the talk page debate, mostly between Oct 27-29. "
Note the diff he refers to [27] is no longer available because an administrator has deleted the evidence.
FT2’s sockpuppetry continuing until FT2 is close to request for adminship: [28]