Difference between revisions of "File:Kazakh Daily Mail article (full view).jpg"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday December 03, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search (Full view image of Daily Mail article that went offline within days of its publication. May have been due to pressure from the Wikimedia Foundation, or due to a plagiarism complaint from The Telegraph, which published the story before Daily Mail, and sev) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Full view image of Daily Mail article that went offline within days of its publication. May have been due to pressure from the Wikimedia Foundation, or due to a plagiarism complaint from The Telegraph, which published the story before Daily Mail, and several sections of the Daily Mail piece were highly similar to those in the Telegraph. | Full view image of Daily Mail article that went offline within days of its publication. May have been due to pressure from the Wikimedia Foundation, or due to a plagiarism complaint from The Telegraph, which published the story before Daily Mail, and several sections of the Daily Mail piece were highly similar to those in the Telegraph. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Original link: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2252845/Dont-mention-friendship-Tony-Blair-Wikipedia-founder-Jimmy-Wales-bans-discussion-PM-new-controversy-Kazakh-links.html |
Latest revision as of 16:42, 1 January 2013
Full view image of Daily Mail article that went offline within days of its publication. May have been due to pressure from the Wikimedia Foundation, or due to a plagiarism complaint from The Telegraph, which published the story before Daily Mail, and several sections of the Daily Mail piece were highly similar to those in the Telegraph.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 16:41, 1 January 2013 | 986 × 1,346 (1.12 MB) | MyWikiBiz (talk | contribs) | Full view image of Daily Mail article that went offline within days of its publication. May have been due to pressure from the Wikimedia Foundation, or due to a plagiarism complaint from The Telegraph, which published the story before Daily Mail, and sev |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
There are no pages that use this file.