| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | [[Category:Logic Museum Parallel Texts]]
| |
| | | | |
| − |
| |
| − | {| border=1 cellpadding=10
| |
| − | !valign = top width=46%|Latin
| |
| − | !valign = top width=54%|English
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | |- valign = top
| |
| − | ||'''Pars I CAP. 1. DE DEFINITIONE TERMINI ET EIUS DIVISIONE IN GENERALI'''
| |
| − | || Part I, chapter 1. Of the definition of the term and of its division in general
| |
| − | |- valign = top
| |
| − |
| |
| − | || (i) Omnes logicae tractatores intendunt astruere quod argumenta ex propositionibus et propositiones ex terminis componuntur. Unde terminus aliud non est quam pars propinqua propositionis. Definiens enim terminum Aristoteles, I Priorum, dicit: "Terminum voco in quem resolvitur propositio, ut praedicatum et de quo praedicatur, vel apposito vel diviso esse vel non esse".
| |
| − |
| |
| − | || All those who treat logic try to show that arguments are put together out of propositions and propositions out of terms. Thus a term is nothing else but a proximate part of a proposition. For, defining a term in ''[[Prior Analytics]]'' I, [[Aristotle]] says "I call a term [that] into which a proposition is resolved, i.e. the predicate and that of which it is predicated, either by what is conjoined or disjoined, [expressing] what is the case or is not.
| |
| − | |}
| |