| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {{Greeting}} | | {{Greeting}} |
| − |
| |
| − | Moulton wrote:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::Please understand that if you contact me to ask me to investigate some aspect of online culture, I am going to interpret that to mean you are asking for a scientific review of the cultural phenomenon that you are raising to my attention.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Reply:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I ''never'' initated contact with you or nor have I ever asked you to investigate anything. You contacted me and demanded an explanation of my redaction[http://mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADeloitte&diff=72043&oldid=72009] and I sent you a reply via email which you then gracelessly posted.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Moulton wrote:
| |
| − | :::It's too late for you to avoid the role you adopted, as both a recipient of a public accusation and as a publisher of an accusation. Each side must now produce evidence, analysis, and reasoning to support their respective theses, and demonstrate how they have attempted to falsify each hypothesis on the table.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Reply:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | One does not adopt a role by being the target of harassment - in that case the role is foisted upon you and I never made a public accusation here, nor did I ever accept your role as a mediator. You have attempted to insert yourself in this situation for an unknown reason. Given the fact that a) you have persistently posted emails without permission and despite being asked not to thus destroying my capacity to trust you and thus destroying your ability to act as a mediator b) you are now falsely claiming that I asked for you to "investigate" anything and falsely claimed that I initiated contact with you when the opposite is true c) you falsely claim that I have made a "public accusation" I'm afraid that I lack confidence in your abilities, have no trust in your capacity to either be neutral or assess evidence (how can I trust someone to intrepret evidence when they fabricate claims such as the two above) and reject your self-appointed role as a mediator. Indeed, given that you were banned from wikipedia indefinitely for engaging in "outing" of editors I think that if anything you're in a conflict of interest here given that it is "outing" that is the issue in question. [[User:Deloitte|Deloitte]] 16:00, 26 October 2008 (PDT)
| |