3,209
edits
Changes
Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Wikipaedophilia (view source)
Revision as of 14:23, 12 September 2008
, 14:23, 12 September 2008→Phdarts is blocked
05:41, 29 June 2008 FT2 (Talk | contribs) blocked "Phdarts (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (Reincarnation of banned user.) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3APhdarts]
05:41, 29 June 2008 FT2 (Talk | contribs) blocked "Phdarts (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (Reincarnation of banned user.) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3APhdarts]
== Peter Damian (Hinnibilis) is blocked ==
The effect is to support the efforts of paedophiles, isn't it? PHD is an exceptionally good editor and has a strong scientific knowledge of the subject. Why was he banned in the first place? Why this secrecy? Hinnibilis (talk) 09:22, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
17:38, 29 June 2008 Ryan Postlethwaite (Talk | contribs) blocked "Peter Damian (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (Harassment of another editor)
But under what strange assumption have I been 'harassing' another user? I accused FT2 of 'in effect' enabling pro-paedophile editors by blocking me and about the only other person prepared to put an end to nonsense claims like 'Jules Verne was a paedophile'. Yes, true. Another set of organisations I am contacting is the many Jules Verne societies. Oops but is that a 'legal threat'? Let's see. [[User:Peter Damian|Peter Damian]] ([[User talk:Peter Damian#top|talk]]) 19:54, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Peter_Damian&diff=prev&oldid=222519778
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:FT2/Archive#WTF.3F.3F.3F.3F.3F.3F.3F this] refers (FT2 archive page).