Line 2,841: |
Line 2,841: |
| | | |
| The next transformation of the source proposition <math>q,\!</math> that we are typically aiming to contemplate in the process of carrying out a ''differential analysis'' of its ''dynamic'' effects or implications, is the yield of the so-called ''difference'' or ''delta'' operator <math>\operatorname{D}.</math> The resultant ''difference proposition'' <math>\operatorname{D}q</math> is defined in terms of the source proposition <math>q\!</math> and the ''shifted proposition'' <math>\operatorname{E}q</math> thusly: | | The next transformation of the source proposition <math>q,\!</math> that we are typically aiming to contemplate in the process of carrying out a ''differential analysis'' of its ''dynamic'' effects or implications, is the yield of the so-called ''difference'' or ''delta'' operator <math>\operatorname{D}.</math> The resultant ''difference proposition'' <math>\operatorname{D}q</math> is defined in terms of the source proposition <math>q\!</math> and the ''shifted proposition'' <math>\operatorname{E}q</math> thusly: |
| + | |
| + | : <math>\operatorname{D}q = \operatorname{E}q - q = \operatorname{E}q - \operatorname{e}q.</math> |
| + | |
| + | : Since "+" and "-" signify the same operation over <math>\mathbb{B},</math> we have: |
| + | |
| + | : <math>\operatorname{D}q = \operatorname{E}q + q = \operatorname{E}q + \operatorname{e}q.</math> |
| + | |
| + | : Since "+" = "exclusive-or", cactus syntax expresses this as: |
| | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
− | | Dq = Eq - q = Eq - eq.
| + | Eq q Eq eq |
− | |
| + | o---o o---o |
− | | Since "+" and "-" signify the same operation over B, we have:
| + | \ / \ / |
− | |
| + | Dq = @ = @ |
− | | Dq = Eq + q = Eq + eq.
| + | |
− | |
| + | Dq = ( Eq , q ) = ( Eq , eq ). |
− | | Since "+" = "exclusive-or", RefLog syntax expresses this as:
| + | </pre> |
− | |
| |
− | | Eq q Eq eq
| |
− | | o---o o---o
| |
− | | \ / \ /
| |
− | | Dq = @ = @
| |
− | |
| |
− | | Dq = ( Eq , q ) = ( Eq , eq ).
| |
− | |
| |
− | | Recall that a k-place bracket "(x_1, x_2, ..., x_k)"
| |
− | | is interpreted (in the "existential interpretation")
| |
− | | to mean "Exactly one of the x_j is false", thus the
| |
− | | two-place bracket is equivalent to the exclusive-or.
| |
| | | |
− | The result of applying the difference operator D to the source
| + | Recall that a <math>k</math>-place bracket "<math>(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_k)\!</math>" is interpreted (in the ''existential interpretation'') to mean "Exactly one of the <math>x_j\!</math> is false", thus the two-place bracket is equivalent to the exclusive-or. |
− | proposition q, conjoined with a query on the center cell c, is:
| |
| | | |
| + | The result of applying the difference operator <math>\operatorname{D}</math> to the source proposition <math>q,\!</math> conjoined with a query on the center cell <math>c,\!</math> is: |
| + | |
| + | <pre> |
| o-------------------------------------------------o | | o-------------------------------------------------o |
| | Dq.uvw | | | | Dq.uvw | |