Changes

Line 176: Line 176:  
In the present case, one can observe the possibility that the author is suggesting the following analogies:
 
In the present case, one can observe the possibility that the author is suggesting the following analogies:
   −
<pre>
+
<ol style="list-style-type:decimal">
1. One analogy says that authoring a text is like piloting a vehicle.  This can be written in either one of two ways.
  −
a. Poet / Poem  =  Pilot / Boat.
  −
b. Poet / Pilot  =  Poem / Boat.
  −
c. Pilot / Poet  =  Boat / Poem.
     −
2. ...
+
<li><p>One analogy says that authoring a text is like piloting a vehicle.  This can be written in either one of two ways.</p></li>
</pre>
+
 
 +
<ol style="list-style-type:lower-alpha">
 +
 
 +
<li><p>Poet / Poem  =  Pilot / Boat.</p></li>
 +
<li><p>Poet / Pilot  =  Poem / Boat.</p></li>
 +
<li><p>Pilot / Poet  =  Boat / Poem.</p></li>
 +
 
 +
</ol>
 +
 
 +
<li>&hellip;</li>
 +
 
 +
</ol>
    
The arrangements of SECs, SEPs, SEQs, and SERs have to do with the analogies that can be discovered and the equalities that can be created among signs, but a hint of the relevant similarities can be found in the ''categorical analogies'' (CANs) or the ''categorical equations'' (CEQs) that it is frequently possible to recognize among general terms, namely, the class names that apply to the corresponding categories of objects.
 
The arrangements of SECs, SEPs, SEQs, and SERs have to do with the analogies that can be discovered and the equalities that can be created among signs, but a hint of the relevant similarities can be found in the ''categorical analogies'' (CANs) or the ''categorical equations'' (CEQs) that it is frequently possible to recognize among general terms, namely, the class names that apply to the corresponding categories of objects.
12,080

edits