Changes

An immediate application of the above rules is presented here, in hopes of giving the reader a concrete illustration of their use in a ready example, but the issues raised can quickly diverge into yet another distracting digression, one not so easily brought under control as the discussion of discussion, but whose complexity probably approaches that of the entire task.  Therefore, a partial adumbration of its character will have to suffice for the present.

An immediate application of the above rules is presented here, in hopes of giving the reader a concrete illustration of their use in a ready example, but the issues raised can quickly diverge into yet another distracting digression, one not so easily brought under control as the discussion of discussion, but whose complexity probably approaches that of the entire task.  Therefore, a partial adumbration of its character will have to suffice for the present.

:: '''<code>y₀ = y&nbsp;<math>\cdot</math>&nbsp;y >= {d,&nbsp;f}{d,&nbsp;f} >= {f}{f}</code>'''

:: <math>y_0 = y \cdot y >\!\!= \{ d , f \} \{ d , f \} >\!\!= \{ f \} \{ f \}</math>

To illustrate the formal charge by taking the present matter to task, the word ''formalization'' is itself exemplary of the ''-ionized'' terms falling under the charge, and so it can be lionized as the nominal head of a prospectively formal discussion.  The reader has a right to object at this point that I have not described what particular action I intend to convey under the heading of ''formalization'', by no means enough to begin applying it to any term, much less itself.  However, anyone can recognize on syntactic grounds that the word is an instance of the formal rule, purely from the character of its terminal ''-ion'', and this can be done aside from all clues about the particular meaning that I intend it to have at the end of formalization.

To illustrate the formal charge by taking the present matter to task, the word ''formalization'' is itself exemplary of the ''-ionized'' terms falling under the charge, and so it can be lionized as the nominal head of a prospectively formal discussion.  The reader has a right to object at this point that I have not described what particular action I intend to convey under the heading of ''formalization'', by no means enough to begin applying it to any term, much less itself.  However, anyone can recognize on syntactic grounds that the word is an instance of the formal rule, purely from the character of its terminal ''-ion'', and this can be done aside from all clues about the particular meaning that I intend it to have at the end of formalization.