Changes

'''Philippe Beaudette''' is a young man who took control of the [[Directory:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]]'s ''[http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Staff#Wikimedia_Strategic_Planning Strategic Planning]'' initiative.  Since that time, he has played petty games of "delete and block" in order to hide serious questions about the future of the Foundation.

'''Philippe Beaudette''' is a young man who took control of the [[Directory:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]]'s ''[http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Staff#Wikimedia_Strategic_Planning Strategic Planning]'' initiative.  Since that time, he has played petty games of "delete and block" in order to hide serious questions about the future of the Foundation.

==Mistakes made==

==Beaudette makes mistakes==

Wikimedia Foundation executive director Sue Gardner [http://strategy.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Foundation/Feb_2010_Letter_to_the_Board&oldid=54466 said]:

Wikimedia Foundation executive director Sue Gardner [http://strategy.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Foundation/Feb_2010_Letter_to_the_Board&oldid=54466 said]:

::''We've interviewed 65 people, including Board and Advisory Board members, staff, editors, onlookers, [b]critics[/b], supporters, and external subject-matter-experts...''

::''We've interviewed 65 people, including Board and Advisory Board members, staff, editors, onlookers, [b]critics[/b], supporters, and external subject-matter-experts...''

One noteworthy critic of the Wikimedia Foundation wanted to know which of the [http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Interviews 65 people] interviewed were identified as "critics" of the Wikimedia Foundation.  So, when asked this question on the Discussion page, if someone could enlighten us as to which "critics" were interviewed...

One noteworthy critic of the Wikimedia Foundation wanted to know which of the [http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Interviews 65 people] interviewed were identified as "critics" of the Wikimedia Foundation.  So, when asked this question on the Discussion page, if someone could enlighten us as to which "critics" were interviewed...

Philippe Beaudette's two-step cowardly response:

Philippe Beaudette's two-step cowardly response:

::[http://strategy.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation/Feb_2010_Letter_to_the_Board&lqt_method=talkpage_history#Background_report_2970 18:03, 20 January 2010]    Critics? Which one(s)?    Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs)    {{Blink|text='''<font color="red">Deleted</font color="red">}}    (content was: 'The letter says that "critics" were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation strategy project. I'd like to know which one(s) in particular. Considering ho...' (and the only contributor was 'Thekohser2'))

::*[http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Thekohser2 17:40, 20 January 2010] Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs) {{Blink|text='''<font color="red">blocked</font color="red">'''}} Thekohser2 (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (account creation disabled, e-mail blocked)

 

::[http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Thekohser2 17:40, 20 January 2010] Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs) {{Blink|text='''<font color="red">blocked</font color="red">}} Thekohser2 (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (account creation disabled, e-mail blocked) ‎ [/quote] ([url=http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Thekohser2]link[/url])

::*[http://strategy.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation/Feb_2010_Letter_to_the_Board&lqt_method=talkpage_history#Background_report_2970 18:03, 20 January 2010]    Critics? Which one(s)?    Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs)    {{Blink|text='''<font color="red">Deleted</font color="red">'''}}    (content was: 'The letter says that "critics" were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation strategy project. I'd like to know which one(s) in particular. Considering ho...' (and the only contributor was 'Thekohser2'))

 

<br>

Has it really come to the point that simply asking which critic(s) were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation strategy project is a censored and blockable offense?

Has it really come to the point that simply asking which critic(s) were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation strategy project is a censored and blockable offense?