Line 1,770: |
Line 1,770: |
| By way of providing a simple illustration of Cook's Theorem, namely, that "Propositional Satisfiability is NP-Complete", I will describe one way to translate finite approximations of turing machines into propositional expressions, using the cactus language syntax for propositional calculus that I will describe in more detail as we proceed. | | By way of providing a simple illustration of Cook's Theorem, namely, that "Propositional Satisfiability is NP-Complete", I will describe one way to translate finite approximations of turing machines into propositional expressions, using the cactus language syntax for propositional calculus that I will describe in more detail as we proceed. |
| | | |
− | <pre> | + | :; <math>\operatorname{Stilt}(k) =</math> |
− | Notation:
| + | :: '''Space and time limited turing machine''', |
| + | :: with <math>k\!</math> units of space and <math>k\!</math> units of time. |
| | | |
− | Stilt(k) =
| + | :; <math>\operatorname{Stunt}(k) =</math> |
− | space and time limited turing machine,
| + | :: '''Space and time limited turing machine''', |
− | with k units of space and k units of time.
| + | :: for computing the parity of a bit string, with number of tape cells of input equal to <math>k.\!</math> |
− | | |
− | Stunt(k) =
| |
− | space and time limited turing machine,
| |
− | for computing the parity of a bit string,
| |
− | with number of tape cells of input equal to k.
| |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| I will follow the pattern of discussion in the book | | I will follow the pattern of discussion in the book |
| by Herbert Wilf, 'Algorithms and Complexity' (1986), | | by Herbert Wilf, 'Algorithms and Complexity' (1986), |