3,209
edits
Changes
Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Wikipaedophilia (view source)
Revision as of 18:29, 12 September 2008
, 18:29, 12 September 2008darts edits
== Block of Phdarts and Peter Damian ==
== Block of Phdarts and Peter Damian ==
=== Phdarts edits ===
* In the news media the term tends to be incorrectly used as a synonym for [[pedophilia]], even though the latter designates the sexual attraction of adults to prepubescent boys or girls. This confusion may arise from the fact that a single organization, the [[North American Man/Boy Love Association]] (NAMBLA), was the most prominent public advocate for both groups, blurring the practical distinction between pederast and [[pro-pedophile activism]] in the public mind, whatever their theoretical differences. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pederasty&diff=prev&oldid=213735837]
* Sure, Haiduc mentioned that there was an article on modern pederasty without linking to it. I did find it rather odd that modern pederasty would be different from pederasty. A merge is necessary, otherwise the majority view will simply not get proper representation. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pederasty&diff=prev&oldid=214543247]
* NAMBLA is a current issue. A pederasty article should not focus so much on times when slaves could not complain about pederasty, or when pedophiles could marry their 7 year old niece. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pederasty&diff=prev&oldid=214544104]
* Pederasty is often associated with child pornography; "The production, possession, and distribution of child pornography are deeply interwoven in the activities of pedophiles, pederasts, and those involved in rings, sexual trafficking, child prostitution, and, more recently, the Internet" (Crosson-Tower 2007). Some researchers say that the Internet contacts increase paedophilia. For example psychology professor Miguel Angel states that “not all paedophiles become pederasts, but "when someone carries a desire inside, he will tend to try to make it reality", [http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=14602611], and the Internet provides a potential catalyst for pederasts and other sexual perverts who may go from images to the real thing [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_19_18/ai_87024964]. According to [[ANESVAD]] the Internet facilitates contact between paedophiles (those who feel attracted to children) or pederasts (those who commit sexual abuse with minors) [http://www.anesvad.org/esi/pub/ingl/doc/informe_pornografia_ingles.pdf]. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pederasty&diff=prev&oldid=215206523]
* Please read the related literature. It refers specifically to pederasty. Pederasty is the title of the sections that the information comes from. By restricting pederasty to a rose-tinted anachronistic variety the article will be extremely narrow. Suppressing information will lead to a highly biased article, in this case, in favour of the notion of pederasty as a legitimate activity. There are more than pro-pederasty views to include here. Pederasty is obviously related to child pornography. Pederasts do not only break the law when they abuse children, they also break the law by creating and collecting child pornography. Thats a fact that requires inclusion in this pederasty article. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pederasty&diff=prev&oldid=218608236]
Scholars on the subject of pederasty include those who write about child abuse and extreme sexual deviance. They are publishers of literature on this matter, and are part of the scholarly literature in general. Can you explain to me why they tend to be deleted so freely on this article? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pederasty&diff=prev&oldid=218611523]
===Wikiquette alert - (Phdarts complains) ===
===Wikiquette alert - (Phdarts complains) ===