Changes

|

|

<math>\begin{array}{lcccr}

<math>\begin{array}{lcccr}

j :  x \ne y

j :  x \ne y

& , &

& , &

Each of these expressions is intended to indicate a set of circumstances that could otherwise be rendered by any one of the following, logically equivalent statements:

Each of these expressions is intended to indicate a set of circumstances that could otherwise be rendered by any one of the following, logically equivalent statements:

# <math>j\!</math> appears to see a coincidence between <math>x\!</math> and <math>y.\!</math>

# <math>j\!</math> draws no distinction between the dimensions <math>x\!</math> and <math>y.\!</math>

| <math>j ~\text{appears to see a coincidence between}~ x ~\text{and}~ y.</math>

# <math>j\!</math> sees <math>x\!</math> and <math>y\!</math> as manifestly equivalent ranges of possibilities.

| <math>j ~\text{draws no distinction between the dimensions}~ x ~\text{and}~ y.</math>

| <math>j ~\text{sees}~ x ~\text{and}~ y ~\text{as manifestly equivalent ranges of possibilities.}</math>

The introduction of explicit names for systems of interpretation, as well as for their interpretive moments, models of interpretation, objective concerns, points of development, and situations of use, is intended to flesh out the lifeless idiom or insipid brand of ''assignment statements'' that are currently found in CL settings, which are typically rendered so abstractly as to constitute a entire style of ''anonymous'', ''passive'', or ''unattributed'' excuses for fully executable commands.

The introduction of explicit names for systems of interpretation, as well as for their interpretive moments, models of interpretation, objective concerns, points of development, and situations of use, is intended to flesh out the lifeless idiom or insipid brand of ''assignment statements'' that are currently found in CL settings, which are typically rendered so abstractly as to constitute a entire style of ''anonymous'', ''passive'', or ''unattributed'' excuses for fully executable commands.