3,209
edits
Changes
Directory:Logic Museum/Simon of Faversham/On Sophistical Refutations (view source)
Revision as of 14:29, 8 November 2009
, 14:29, 8 November 2009→References
==References==
==References==
*c. 1295 Simon of Faversham, <i|Quaestiones novae super libro Elenchorum</i>, q. 24.; Utrum haec sit vera 'Caesar est mortuus'; ed S. Ebbesen & al., in <i>Simon of Faversham, Quaestiones super libro Elenchorum</i> (Studies and Texts, 60), Toronto, Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1984, 161-4.
*c. 1295 Simon of Faversham, <i>Quaestiones novae super libro Elenchorum</i>, q. 24.; Utrum haec sit vera 'Caesar est mortuus'; ed S. Ebbesen & al., in <i>Simon of Faversham, Quaestiones super libro Elenchorum</i> (Studies and Texts, 60), Toronto, Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1984, 161-4.
[http://uwp.edu/~longeway John Longeway]'s website
*[http://uwp.edu/~longeway John Longeway]'s website
*Longeway, J., [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simon-faversham Simon of Faversham]] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
*Longeway, J., [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simon-faversham Simon of Faversham]] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
*Longeway, J., ''Simon of Faversham'', in <i>A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages</i>, ed. Gracia & Noone, Oxford 2006.
*Longeway, J., ''Simon of Faversham'', in <i>A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages</i>, ed. Gracia & Noone, Oxford 2006.
And this is reasonable, that just as by its generation being alive is predicated of it, so by its destruction being dead is predicated of it. And for that reason, just as 'Caesar is living' is true, with him living, similarly also 'Caesar is dead', with him not existing. Wherefore the Commentator said as much, that [the proposition] is <i>per se</i> because being alive accompanies the union of the soul with the body, [but] not because it is <i>per se</i> without qualification.
And this is reasonable, that just as by its generation being alive is predicated of it, so by its destruction being dead is predicated of it. And for that reason, just as 'Caesar is living' is true, with him living, similarly also 'Caesar is dead', with him not existing. Wherefore the Commentator said as much, that [the proposition] is <i>per se</i> because being alive accompanies the union of the soul with the body, [but] not because it is <i>per se</i> without qualification.
|}
|}
==Endnotes==
==Endnotes==