Changes

384 bytes added ,  01:18, 22 October 2009
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard approach
Line 109: Line 109:  
== Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard ==
 
== Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard ==
   −
:"Tito was the commander of the Partisans and there are far too many examples of '''mass murders''' & '''mass arrests''' [http://www.goliotok.com/]  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goli_otok][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goli_otok] for it to be ignored (& there are many more). Any good encyclopedic article should make reference to them. It would be like Stalin without his rule of terror being documented. This just dosen't make sense in the modern world. What we have here is a clear avoidance of these issues (in the article), thus making it biased. Direktor stated ''"they have absolutely nothing to do with Josip Broz Tito"''. Well then,what did Tito do? Did he let these horrible events just happen? Did he have a moral conscience (the war did end)? Was he incompetent? Was he the great leader that the Yugoslav Communist state propaganda machine portrayed him to be? Even the Wiki article states this. I have shown here credible references and sources to prove my argument, please take them into account."
+
"Tito was the commander of the Partisans and there are far too many examples of '''mass murders''' & '''mass arrests''' [http://www.goliotok.com/]  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goli_otok][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goli_otok] for it to be ignored (& there are many more). Any good encyclopedic article should make reference to them. It would be like Stalin without his rule of terror being documented. This just dosen't make sense in the modern world. What we have here is a clear avoidance of these issues (in the article), thus making it biased. Direktor stated ''"they have absolutely nothing to do with Josip Broz Tito"''. Well then,what did Tito do? Did he let these horrible events just happen? Did he have a moral conscience (the war did end)? Was he incompetent? Was he the great leader that the Yugoslav Communist state propaganda machine portrayed him to be? Even the Wiki article states this. I have shown here credible references and sources to prove my argument, please take them into account."
   −
Taken from Summary of Josip Broz Tito Article-21 October 2009 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Summary_of_Josip_Broz_Tito_Article]
+
''Taken'' from Summary of Josip Broz Tito Article-21 October 2009 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Summary_of_Josip_Broz_Tito_Article].
 +
 
 +
:Hi Ockham. Hmmm! I 'm finding the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard approach to these issues to be be quite odd. It's taken on a darker tone. They (the Admin) have not responded at all. No encyclopedia should remain quite on these matters (this is media material). This just '''dosen't''' make any sense. Cheers [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 18:18, 21 October 2009 (PDT)
7,882

edits