Changes

==Note 15==

==Note 15==

I have been planning for quite some time now to make my return to Peirce's "Description of a Notation for the Logic of Relatives" (1870), and I can see that it's just about time to get down to it, so let this current bit of rambling inquiry function as the preamble to that.  All we need at the present, though, is a way of telling what is substantial from what is inessential in the brook between symbolic conceits and dramatic actions that we find afforded by means of the pragmatic maxim.

| have practical bearings you 'conceive' the

| objects of your 'conception' to have.  Then,

| your 'conception' of those effects is the

| whole of your 'conception' of the object.

| "Maxim of Pragmaticism", CP 5.438.

Back to our "subinstance", the example in support of our first example. I will try to reconstruct it in a less confusing way.

 

Back to our "subinstance", the example in support of our first example.

I will now reconstruct it in a way that may prove to be less confusing.

Let us make up the model universe $1$ = A + B + C and the 2-adic relation

Let us make up the model universe $1$ = A + B + C and the 2-adic relation

n = "noder of", as when "X is a data record that contains a pointer to Y".

n = "noder of", as when "X is a data record that contains a pointer to Y".