12,080
edits
Changes
Directory:Jon Awbrey/Papers/Peirce's 1870 Logic Of Relatives (view source)
Revision as of 20:06, 9 April 2009
, 20:06, 9 April 2009→Commentary Note 10.5
===Commentary Note 10.5===
===Commentary Note 10.5===
We have sufficiently covered the application of the comma functor, or the diagonal extension, to absolute terms, so let us return to where we were in working our way through CP 3.73, and see whether we can validate Peirce's statements about the "commifications" of 2-adic relative terms that yield their 3-adic diagonal extensions.
We have sufficiently covered the application of the comma functor, or the diagonal extension, to absolute terms, so let us return to where we were in working our way through CP 3.73 and see whether we can validate Peirce's statements about the "commifications" of 2-adic relative terms that yield their 3-adic diagonal extensions.
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE-->
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE-->
<p>Then:</p>
<p>Then:</p>
|-
| align="center" | <math>\mathit{l},\!\mathit{s}\mathrm{w}</math>
|-
|
<p>will denote a lover of a woman that is a servant of that woman.</p>
<p>The comma here after <math>\mathit{l}\!</math> should not be considered as altering at all the meaning of <math>\mathit{l}\!</math>, but as only a subjacent sign, serving to alter the arrangement of the correlates.</p>
<p>will denote a lover of a woman that is a servant of that woman.</p>
<p>The comma here after 'l' should not be considered as altering at all the meaning of 'l', but as only a subjacent sign, serving to alter the arrangement of the correlates. (Peirce, CP 3.73).</p>
<p>(Peirce, CP 3.73).</p>
|}
|}