Changes

→‎Step 4: markup
Line 1,014: Line 1,014:  
===Step 4===
 
===Step 4===
   −
<pre>
+
The construction of the term <math>\operatorname{T}</math> of the appropriate type in terms of the primitive typed combinators of the forms <math>\operatorname{K}</math> and <math>\operatorname{S}</math> is analogous to the proof of the corresponding proposition from the intuitionistic axiom schemes attached to those forms.
The construction of the term T of the appropriate type in terms of the
  −
primitive typed combinators of the forms K and S is analogous to the
  −
proof of the corresponding proposition from the intuitionistic axiom
  −
schemes attached to those forms.
     −
Incidentally, note the inobtrusive appearance of renaming strategies in the
+
Incidentally, note the inobtrusive appearance of renaming strategies in the progress of this work.  Renaming is the natural operation that substitution is the reverse of.  With these humble beginnings we have reached a birthplace, a native ground, of the [[sign relation]], an irreducible three-place relationship among what is indicated, what happens to indicate it, and all of the equivalent or associated indications we may find or create in reference to it.
progress of this work.  Renaming is the natural operation that substitution
  −
is the reverse of.  With these humble beginnings we have reached a birthplace,
  −
a native ground, of the sign relation, an irreducible three-place relationship
  −
among what is indicated, what happens to indicate it, and all of the equivalent
  −
or associated indications we may find or create in reference to it.
      +
<pre>
 
For example, let "G", the interposed interpretant,
 
For example, let "G", the interposed interpretant,
 
denote whatever it is, the supposed object, that
 
denote whatever it is, the supposed object, that
12,080

edits