Changes

→‎Propositions and Sentences: delete reconciled changes
Line 74: Line 74:     
<pre>
 
<pre>
Introducing the realm of "values" is a stopgap measure that temporarily
  −
permits the discussion to avoid certain singularities in the embedding
  −
sign relation, and allowing the process of "evaluation" as a compromise
  −
mode of signification between connotation and denotation only manages to
  −
steer around a topic that eventually has to be mapped in full, but these
  −
strategies do allow the discussion to proceed a little further without
  −
having to answer questions that are too difficult to be settled fully
  −
or even tackled directly at this point.  As far as the relations among
  −
connoting, denoting, and evaluing are concerned, it is possible that
  −
all of these constitute independent dimensions of significance that
  −
a sign might be able to enjoy, but since the notion of connotation
  −
is already generic enough to contain multitudes of subspecies, I am
  −
going to subsume, on a tentative basis, all of the conceivable modes
  −
of "evaluing" within the broader concept of connotation.
  −
  −
With this degree of flexibility in mind, one can say that the sentence
  −
"f(x) = %1%" latently connotes what the sign "f(x)" patently connotes.
  −
Taken in abstraction, both syntactic entities fall into an equivalence
  −
class of signs that constitutes an abstract object, a thing of value
  −
that is "identified by" the sign "f(x)", and thus an object that might
  −
as well be "identified with" the value f(x).
  −
  −
The upshot of this whole discussion of evaluation is that it allows one to
  −
rewrite the definitions of indicator functions and their fibers as follows:
  −
   
The "indicator function" or the "characteristic function" of a set Q c X,
 
The "indicator function" or the "characteristic function" of a set Q c X,
 
written "f_Q", is the map from X to the boolean domain %B% = {%0%, %1%}
 
written "f_Q", is the map from X to the boolean domain %B% = {%0%, %1%}
12,080

edits