Line 3,177: |
Line 3,177: |
| ===Note 11=== | | ===Note 11=== |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | '''Interlude''' |
− | | "The burden of genius is undeliverable"
| |
− | | From a poster, as I once misread it,
| |
− | | Marlboro, Vermont, c. 1976
| |
| | | |
− | How does Cosmo, and by this I mean my pet personification
| + | <blockquote> |
− | of cosmic order in the universe, not to be too tautologous | + | <p>"The burden of genius is undeliverable"</p> |
− | about it, preserve a memory like that, a goodly fraction of
| |
− | a century later, whether localized to this body that's kept
| |
− | going by this heart, and whether by common assumption still
| |
− | more localized to the spongey fibres of this brain, or not?
| |
| | | |
− | It strikes me, as it has struck others, that it's terribly | + | <p>From a poster, as I once misread it,<br>Marlboro, Vermont, ''c.'' 1976</p> |
− | unlikely to be stored in persistent patterns of activation, | + | </blockquote> |
− | for "activation" and "persistent" are nigh a contradiction | + | |
− | in terms, as even the author, Cosmo, of the 'I Ching' knew. | + | How does Cosmo, and by this I mean my pet personification of cosmic order in the universe, not to be too tautologous about it, preserve a memory like that, a goodly fraction of a century later, whether localized to this body that's kept going by this heart, and whether by common assumption still more localized to the spongey fibres of this brain, or not? |
| + | |
| + | It strikes me, as it has struck others, that it's terribly unlikely to be stored in persistent patterns of activation, for ''activation'' and ''persistent'' are nigh a contradiction in terms, as even the author, Cosmo, of the ''I Ching'' knew. |
| | | |
| But that was then, this is now, so let me try to say it planar. | | But that was then, this is now, so let me try to say it planar. |
− | </pre>
| |
| | | |
| ===Note 12=== | | ===Note 12=== |