Changes

Here I now delve into subject matters that are more specifically logical in the character of their interpretation.

Here I now delve into subject matters that are more specifically logical in the character of their interpretation.

Imagine that we are sitting in one of the cells of a venn diagram, contemplating the walls.  There are <math>k\!</math> of them, one for each positive feature <math>x_1, \ldots, x_k</math> in our universe of discourse.  Our particular cell is described by a concatenation of <math>k\!</math> signed assertions, positive or negative, regarding each of these features, and this description of our position amounts to what is called an "interpretation" of whatever proposition may rule the space, or reign on the universe of discourse.  But are we locked into this interpretation?

Imagine that we are sitting in one of the cells of a venn diagram, contemplating the walls.  There are <math>k\!</math> of them, one for each positive feature <math>x_1, \ldots, x_k</math> in our universe of discourse.  Our particular cell is described by a concatenation of <math>k\!</math> signed assertions, positive or negative, regarding each of these features, and this description of our position amounts to what is called an "interpretation" of whatever proposition may rule the space, or reign on the universe of discourse.  But are we locked into this interpretation?