Line 1,913: |
Line 1,913: |
| | | |
| ===Commentary Note 10.10=== | | ===Commentary Note 10.10=== |
| + | |
| + | Figure 8 depicts the last of the three examples involving the composition of 3-adic relatives with 2-adic relatives: |
| | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
− | Figure 8 depicts the last of the three examples involving
| |
− | the composition of 3-adic relatives with 2-adic relatives:
| |
− |
| |
| o-------------------------------------------------o | | o-------------------------------------------------o |
| | | | | | | |
Line 1,931: |
Line 1,930: |
| o-------------------------------------------------o | | o-------------------------------------------------o |
| Figure 8. Lover that is a Servant of a Woman | | Figure 8. Lover that is a Servant of a Woman |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
| The hypergraph picture of the abstract composition is given in Figure 14. | | The hypergraph picture of the abstract composition is given in Figure 14. |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| o---------------------------------------------------------------------o | | o---------------------------------------------------------------------o |
| | | | | | | |
Line 1,959: |
Line 1,960: |
| o---------------------------------------------------------------------o | | o---------------------------------------------------------------------o |
| Figure 14. Anything that's a Lover of Anything and that's a Servant of It | | Figure 14. Anything that's a Lover of Anything and that's a Servant of It |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | This example illustrates the way that Peirce analyzes the logical conjunction, | + | This example illustrates the way that Peirce analyzes the logical conjunction, we might even say the "parallel conjunction", of a couple of 2-adic relatives in terms of the comma extension and the same style of composition that we saw in the last example, that is, according to a pattern of anaphora that invokes the teridentity relation. |
− | we might even say the "parallel conjunction", of a couple of 2-adic relatives | |
− | in terms of the comma extension and the same style of composition that we saw | |
− | in the last example, that is, according to a pattern of anaphora that invokes | |
− | the teridentity relation. | |
| | | |
− | If we lay out this analysis of conjunction on the spreadsheet model | + | If we lay out this analysis of conjunction on the spreadsheet model of relational composition, the gist of it is the diagonal extension of a 2-adic "loving" relation ''L'' ⊆ ''X'' × ''Y'' to the corresponding 3-adic "loving and being" relation ''L'', ⊆ ''X'' × ''X'' × ''Y'', which is then composed in a specific way with a 2-adic "serving" relation ''S'' ⊆ ''X'' × ''Y'', so as to determine the 2-adic relation ''L'',''S'' ⊆ ''X'' × ''Y''. Table 15 schematizes the associated constraints on tuples. |
− | of relational composition, the gist of it is the diagonal extension | |
− | of a 2-adic "loving" relation L c X x Y to the corresponding 3-adic | |
− | "loving and being" relation L_, c X x X x Y, which is then composed | |
− | in a specific way with a 2-adic "serving" relation S c X x Y, so as | |
− | to determine the 2-adic relation L,S c X x Y. Table 15 schematizes | |
− | the associated constraints on tuples. | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| Table 15. Conjunction Via Composition | | Table 15. Conjunction Via Composition |
| o---------o---------o---------o---------o | | o---------o---------o---------o---------o |