Changes

Line 1,913: Line 1,913:     
===Commentary Note 10.10===
 
===Commentary Note 10.10===
 +
 +
Figure 8 depicts the last of the three examples involving the composition of 3-adic relatives with 2-adic relatives:
    
<pre>
 
<pre>
Figure 8 depicts the last of the three examples involving
  −
the composition of 3-adic relatives with 2-adic relatives:
  −
   
o-------------------------------------------------o
 
o-------------------------------------------------o
 
|                                                |
 
|                                                |
Line 1,931: Line 1,930:  
o-------------------------------------------------o
 
o-------------------------------------------------o
 
Figure 8.  Lover that is a Servant of a Woman
 
Figure 8.  Lover that is a Servant of a Woman
 +
</pre>
    
The hypergraph picture of the abstract composition is given in Figure 14.
 
The hypergraph picture of the abstract composition is given in Figure 14.
    +
<pre>
 
o---------------------------------------------------------------------o
 
o---------------------------------------------------------------------o
 
|                                                                    |
 
|                                                                    |
Line 1,959: Line 1,960:  
o---------------------------------------------------------------------o
 
o---------------------------------------------------------------------o
 
Figure 14.  Anything that's a Lover of Anything and that's a Servant of It
 
Figure 14.  Anything that's a Lover of Anything and that's a Servant of It
 +
</pre>
   −
This example illustrates the way that Peirce analyzes the logical conjunction,
+
This example illustrates the way that Peirce analyzes the logical conjunction, we might even say the "parallel conjunction", of a couple of 2-adic relatives in terms of the comma extension and the same style of composition that we saw in the last example, that is, according to a pattern of anaphora that invokes the teridentity relation.
we might even say the "parallel conjunction", of a couple of 2-adic relatives
  −
in terms of the comma extension and the same style of composition that we saw
  −
in the last example, that is, according to a pattern of anaphora that invokes
  −
the teridentity relation.
     −
If we lay out this analysis of conjunction on the spreadsheet model
+
If we lay out this analysis of conjunction on the spreadsheet model of relational composition, the gist of it is the diagonal extension of a 2-adic "loving" relation ''L''&nbsp;&sube;&nbsp;''X''&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;''Y'' to the corresponding 3-adic "loving and being" relation ''L'',&nbsp;&sube;&nbsp;''X''&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;''X''&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;''Y'', which is then composed in a specific way with a 2-adic "serving" relation ''S''&nbsp;&sube;&nbsp;''X''&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;''Y'', so as to determine the 2-adic relation ''L'',''S''&nbsp;&sube;&nbsp;''X''&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;''Y''.  Table 15 schematizes the associated constraints on tuples.
of relational composition, the gist of it is the diagonal extension
  −
of a 2-adic "loving" relation L c X x Y to the corresponding 3-adic
  −
"loving and being" relation L_, c X x X x Y, which is then composed
  −
in a specific way with a 2-adic "serving" relation S c X x Y, so as
  −
to determine the 2-adic relation L,S c X x Y.  Table 15 schematizes
  −
the associated constraints on tuples.
      +
<pre>
 
Table 15.  Conjunction Via Composition
 
Table 15.  Conjunction Via Composition
 
o---------o---------o---------o---------o
 
o---------o---------o---------o---------o
12,080

edits