Changes

"Om nom nom nom"? (partial)
Line 1: Line 1: −
I happen to have worked in the field of <strong>marketing research</strong> for nearly two decades, so I do know a thing or two about the subject.
+
I happen to have worked in the field of '''marketing research''' for nearly two decades, so I do know a thing or two about the subject.
    
Observe how Wikipedia has been "improving" lately on the subject:
 
Observe how Wikipedia has been "improving" lately on the subject:
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
     <li>The word "guise" should be <a title="Guise should be guse" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing_research&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=306760661" target="_blank">spelled "guse"</a>.</li>
+
     <li>The word "guise" should be [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing_research&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=306760661 spelled "guse"].</li>
     <li>Just a <a title="XMNS" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing_research&amp;diff=next&amp;oldid=306760661" target="_blank">bit of XMNS</a>, you know.</li>
+
     <li>Just a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing_research&amp;diff=next&amp;oldid=306760661 bit of XMNS], you know.</li>
     <li>No, we'd <a title="Remove XMNS" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing_research&amp;diff=next&amp;oldid=307314261" target="_blank">rather not</a> have XMNS.</li>
+
     <li>No, we'd [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing_research&amp;diff=next&amp;oldid=307314261 rather not] have XMNS.</li>
     <li>People need to know what <a title="Rhett Richards licks" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing_research&amp;diff=next&amp;oldid=307314286" target="_blank">Rhett Richards is licking</a>.</li>
+
     <li>People need to know what [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing_research&amp;diff=next&amp;oldid=307314286 Rhett Richards is licking].</li>
     <li>No, we'd <a title="Rhett Richard does not lick" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing_research&amp;diff=next&amp;oldid=308030700" target="_blank">rather not</a> know.</li>
+
     <li>No, we'd [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing_research&amp;diff=next&amp;oldid=308030700 rather not] know.</li>
     <li>Marketing research is <a title="wOOOOOO" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing_research&amp;diff=next&amp;oldid=308030789" target="_blank">worth a cheer</a>!</li>
+
     <li>Marketing research is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing_research&amp;diff=next&amp;oldid=308030789 worth a cheer]!</li>
     <li>The word "guise" should be spelled "guise", but the word "l.market" <a title="Spelling lmarket" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing_research&amp;diff=next&amp;oldid=308819392" target="_blank">should be spelled "lmarket"</a>.</li>
+
     <li>The word "guise" should be spelled "guise", but the word "l.market" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing_research&amp;diff=next&amp;oldid=308819392 should be spelled "lmarket"].</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
And we're still cheering for marketing research!
 
And we're still cheering for marketing research!
35

edits