Changes

:::::: This is exactly as expected. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 06:29, 24 October 2009 (PDT)

:::::: This is exactly as expected. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 06:29, 24 October 2009 (PDT)

::::::: Your're saying that's expected, because the editors are just not '''qualified''' or maybe they just playing ''boys club'' games (or both).[[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 06:59, 24 October 2009 (PDT)

::::::: Your're saying that's expected, because the editors are just not '''qualified''' or maybe they just playing ''boys club'' games (or both).[[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 06:59, 24 October 2009 (PDT)

G-Day! ''It's taken on a darker tone''. What I am referring to is the ethical and moral issues involved in creating a feel good article about a man who allowed '''mass murders''' & '''mass arrests'''. Granted during the cold war he was portrayed as a hero (that was such a long time ago), however this is not the whole truth. On a lighter note, these days, I am going for the preservative free wine. Cheers [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 19:16, 24 October 2009 (PDT)

G-Day! ''It's taken on a darker tone''. What I am referring to is the '''ethical''' and '''moral''' issues involved in creating a feel good article about a man who allowed '''mass arrests/torture''' & '''mass murders''' (100 000 plus). Granted during the cold war he was portrayed as a hero (that was such a long time ago), however this is not the whole truth. Then we have editors surporting the article & finaly an admin who just don't get involved '''???''' What is going on at Wiki? Not very encyclopedic that's for sure.  What if there was a feel good article on Stalin or Hitler?  So do you think our article is nearly finish? On a lighter note, these days I am going for the preservative free wine. Cheers [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 01:55, 25 October 2009 (PDT)