Line 94: |
Line 94: |
| | | |
| :::::Blissy, the first "correction" of your [http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dpqbn5p_0dvbzkzgt cited reference] reads as follows: | | :::::Blissy, the first "correction" of your [http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dpqbn5p_0dvbzkzgt cited reference] reads as follows: |
− | ::::::''At no stage did Mr.Baxter (as Poetlister or otherwise) give the name Giselle Hillman. The name Giselle Hillman was given [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mindspillage&diff=next&oldid=32464977 once, by Wikipedia user Zordrac in a message to Wikipedia administrator Mindspillage on 23rd December 2005].'' | + | ::::::''At no stage did Mr.Baxter (as Poetlister or otherwise) give the name Gazelle Hillperson. The name Gazelle Hillperson was given [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mindspillage&diff=next&oldid=32464977 once, by Wikipedia user Zordrac in a message to Wikipedia administrator Mindspillage on 23rd December 2005].'' |
| :::::Is there evidence one way or the other whether User:Zordrac is another sockpuppet of the author of the PoetGuy Caper? My reading of [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=20205&view=findpost&p=127804 this post by FT2] leads me to infer that FT2 believed Zordrac to be yet another character in the PoetGuy cast of characters. Have I misread FT2's analysis? —[[User:Moulton|Moulton]] 19:30, 11 October 2008 (PDT) | | :::::Is there evidence one way or the other whether User:Zordrac is another sockpuppet of the author of the PoetGuy Caper? My reading of [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=20205&view=findpost&p=127804 this post by FT2] leads me to infer that FT2 believed Zordrac to be yet another character in the PoetGuy cast of characters. Have I misread FT2's analysis? —[[User:Moulton|Moulton]] 19:30, 11 October 2008 (PDT) |
| | | |
Line 103: |
Line 103: |
| ::::::::That page does not contain any claims by Proabiv. Please direct me to the place (page and passage therein) where, [http://mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Talk:Criticism_of_crowdsourcing&diff=71341&oldid=71340 as you write], "''Proabivouac claimed'' that I created the Poetlister identity, based purely on the fact that I had invited Poetlister to use Classmates.com." I am looking for a page ''written by Proabiv'' and bearing that alleged claim ''in his writing''. —[[User:Moulton|Moulton]] 14:41, 12 October 2008 (PDT) | | ::::::::That page does not contain any claims by Proabiv. Please direct me to the place (page and passage therein) where, [http://mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Talk:Criticism_of_crowdsourcing&diff=71341&oldid=71340 as you write], "''Proabivouac claimed'' that I created the Poetlister identity, based purely on the fact that I had invited Poetlister to use Classmates.com." I am looking for a page ''written by Proabiv'' and bearing that alleged claim ''in his writing''. —[[User:Moulton|Moulton]] 14:41, 12 October 2008 (PDT) |
| | | |
− | :::::::Actually, the report states that the information was "added by " you, not written by: we'd assumed that when you ''referred'' "Giselle Hillman" of Ilford 2000 to classmates.com, that her name then appeared in her class list.[[User:Proabivouac|Proabivouac]] 14:14, 12 October 2008 (PDT) | + | :::::::Actually, the report states that the information was "added by " you, not written by: we'd assumed that when you ''referred'' "Gazelle Hillperson" of Ilford 2000 to classmates.com, that her name then appeared in her class list.[[User:Proabivouac|Proabivouac]] 14:14, 12 October 2008 (PDT) |
| Um, User:Zordrac is me. LOL. I have used Zordrac since 1996, Blissyu2 since 1998 and Cat since 1992. I have said on many places that they are all the same person. Most of the rest of the time, I use my real name (usually just my first name), Adrian. There are other people that use the name "Zordrac", many other people that use the name "Cat", and a few other people that use the name "Blissyu2" (mostly impersonators - for example Blissyu2 on Wikipedia is not me, but rather was created by probably Antaeus Feldspar or Longhair to impersonate me). However, I can confirm that indeed User:Zordrac on Wikipedia is the same person as Blissyu2 on Wikipedia Review. | | Um, User:Zordrac is me. LOL. I have used Zordrac since 1996, Blissyu2 since 1998 and Cat since 1992. I have said on many places that they are all the same person. Most of the rest of the time, I use my real name (usually just my first name), Adrian. There are other people that use the name "Zordrac", many other people that use the name "Cat", and a few other people that use the name "Blissyu2" (mostly impersonators - for example Blissyu2 on Wikipedia is not me, but rather was created by probably Antaeus Feldspar or Longhair to impersonate me). However, I can confirm that indeed User:Zordrac on Wikipedia is the same person as Blissyu2 on Wikipedia Review. |
| | | |
Line 335: |
Line 335: |
| | | |
| : I have begun [[Wikipedia Review]] here. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 03:22, 13 October 2008 (PDT) | | : I have begun [[Wikipedia Review]] here. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 03:22, 13 October 2008 (PDT) |
− |
| |
− | =="Krimpet" coverup==
| |
− |
| |
− | Let's also observe that Wikipedia Review has covered up the identity of male transvestite [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Krimpet"Krimpet"] (a.k.a. Francis "Francine" S. Rogers,) a Wikipedia administrator known for outing others and attacking their BLPs, by [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=20613&view=findpost&p=135471 deleting an entire thread].
| |
− |
| |
− | "Krimpet," like "Poetlister" and others is a male tranvestite pretending to be a woman: [http://people.rit.edu/~fsr3886/], [http://people.rit.edu/~fsr3886/resume.pdf],[http://pear.php.net/user/krimpet], [http://www.linkedin.com/pub/9/541/117]
| |
− |
| |
− | The reason this was covered up is very likely that "Krimpet", like "Poetlister" and "Homey," opposes SlimVirgin (an actual woman, not a [http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=dd7ss2g_0fshgw6hq&hl=en tranvestite as per the Review's staff]) and Jayjg.[[User:Proabivouac|Proabivouac]] 03:53, 13 October 2008 (PDT)
| |
− |
| |
− | : OK how we deal with this is by the MWB 'directory' system. I have created [[Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Wikipedia Review (Criticism)]] which contains any potentially defamatory information. I am responsible for this directory, and only I have passworded access to it. You can create your own directory if you wish. We can share each others' material if we wish. Mainspace material such as [[Wikipedia Review]] must be verifiable and sourced in a similar way to [[Wikipedia]] itself. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 04:04, 13 October 2008 (PDT)
| |
− |
| |
− | ::Whether KRIMPET, POETLISTER are TRANIES, CROSS DRESSES, DYKE'S OR FAIRES has really no bearing on Wikipeida in so much as These people have hurt others with the way they have used Wikipeida as a weapon of revenge and vindictive pursuits.[[User:Joehazelton|Joehazelton]] 04:35, 13 October 2008 (PDT)
| |
− |
| |
− | ::: This is why I suggest using the 'Directory' system for such material, if it is felt necessary (I am mildly intrigued by this sort of tabloid material). Reliable, sober and well-sourced material that would be useful to the more respectable journals, and of course to the [[Sloan Foundation]] can go in mainspace. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 04:56, 13 October 2008 (PDT)
| |
− |
| |
− | : I've posted a response (of sorts) to these claims [[Directory talk:The Wikipedia Point of View/Wikipedia Review (Criticism)|here]]. ''Enjoy!'' [[User:Sueme|Somey]] 01:11, 30 October 2008 (PDT)
| |