Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday November 30, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
1 byte removed ,  21:00, 3 December 2008
→‎Logical Equivalence Problem: 2 spaces after period → 1 space after period
Line 19: Line 19:  
===Solution===
 
===Solution===
   −
[http://mathforum.org/kb/plaintext.jspa?messageID=6514666 Solution posted by Jon Awbrey, using the calculus of logical graphs].
+
[http://mathforum.org/kb/plaintext.jspa?messageID=6514666 Solution posted by Jon Awbrey, employing the calculus of logical graphs].
    
In logical graphs, the required equivalence looks like this:
 
In logical graphs, the required equivalence looks like this:
Line 183: Line 183:  
Proceeding from these axioms is a handful of very simple theorems that we tend to use over and over in deriving more complex theorems.  A sample of these frequently used theorems is given here:
 
Proceeding from these axioms is a handful of very simple theorems that we tend to use over and over in deriving more complex theorems.  A sample of these frequently used theorems is given here:
   −
:* [[Logical_graph#C1.__Double_negation_theorem|C<sub>1</sub>. Double Negation Theorem]]
+
:* [[Logical_graph#C1._Double_negation_theorem|C<sub>1</sub>. Double Negation Theorem]]
:* [[Logical_graph#C2.__Generation_theorem|C<sub>2</sub>. Generation Theorem]]
+
:* [[Logical_graph#C2._Generation_theorem|C<sub>2</sub>. Generation Theorem]]
:* [[Logical_graph#C3.__Dominant_form_theorem|C<sub>3</sub>. Dominant Form Theorem]]
+
:* [[Logical_graph#C3._Dominant_form_theorem|C<sub>3</sub>. Dominant Form Theorem]]
12,080

edits

Navigation menu